Literature DB >> 17286196

The OVIS study: health related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 in German female patients with breast cancer from Schleswig-Holstein.

A Waldmann1, R Pritzkuleit, H Raspe, A Katalinic.   

Abstract

The OVIS study is a population-based study that aims at evaluating medical care in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany). In this paper, the health related quality of life (QoL, EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23) of 1,927 women with breast cancer is reported. The global health status/QoL score was comparable to reference data of the age-adjusted German general population, but clinical meaningful differences (> or = 10 points) were found for all functioning scales (with the exception of physical functioning) and for three of the symptom scales/items (fatigue, dyspnoe, insomnia) with OVIS patients showing more deficits. Furthermore, OVIS patients scored higher on the item financial difficulties. Logistic regression analyses revealed that coming from an urban surrounding, having a higher social status and attendance to a regular aftercare predicted a good overall QoL, while factors that were related to perceived complications in the course of the therapy raised the risk for a low QoL rating. It is of interest, that attendance to a rehabilitation and interest in self-help groups independently predicted an increased risk for a low quality of life. Overall, we assume the global QoL is rating slightly too optimistic since major deficits were reported on the specific physical and functional scales/items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17286196     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9161-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   3.440


  24 in total

1.  Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population.

Authors:  R Schwarz; A Hinz
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Psychosocial adjustment in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Irvine; B Brown; D Crooks; J Roberts; G Browne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  [Assessment of quality of life after resection of colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  H U Zieren; C A Jacobi; J Zieren; J M Müller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. an explorative investigation.

Authors:  J Bernhard; A Lowy; R Maibach; C Hürny
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

Authors:  J Bernhard; C Hürny; R Maibach; R Herrmann; U Laffer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

Authors:  D Osoba; G Rodrigues; J Myles; B Zee; J Pater
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Surviving cancer: a comparison of 5-year disease-free breast cancer survivors with healthy women.

Authors:  Vicki S Helgeson; Patricia L Tomich
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Karlien A Van De Sijpe; Kristof K Daems; Stanislas J Monstrey; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2003-07

Review 9.  Sexual dysfunction after treatment for gynaecologic and breast malignancies.

Authors:  Maxine L Stead
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  [Breast carcinoma--revision of follow-up recommendations. 2: Special diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy, thoracic radiography, liver ultrasonic, mammography and laboratory tests].

Authors:  H Sauer; D Hölzel
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1995-05-20
View more
  29 in total

1.  Quality of life in cancer patients-a comparison of inpatient, outpatient, and rehabilitation settings.

Authors:  Andreas Hinz; Joachim Weis; Hermann Faller; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Monika Keller; Holger Schulz; Karl Wegscheider; Uwe Koch; Kristina Geue; Heide Götze; Anja Mehnert
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Correspondence (reply): In Reply.

Authors:  Annika Waldmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Impact of Surgery Type on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mustafa Akça; Alper Ata; Erdinç Nayır; Süleyman Erdoğdu; Ali Arıcan
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  A qualitative assessment of upper quarter dysfunction reported by physical therapists treated for breast cancer or treating breast cancer sequelae.

Authors:  Pamela K Levangie; Anita M Santasier; Nicole L Stout; Lucinda Pfalzer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The Mode of Detection Is Not Associated with Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Braun; Marc-André Kurosinski; Laura Khil; Joke Tio; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Well-being of newly diagnosed women with breast cancer: which factors matter more?

Authors:  Rugilė Ivanauskienė; Žilvinas Padaiga; Renata Šimoliūnienė; Giedrė Smailytė; Auksė Domeikienė
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Spiritual well-being and quality of life in Iranian women with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

Authors:  Najmeh Jafari; Ziba Farajzadegan; Ahmadreza Zamani; Fatemeh Bahrami; Hamid Emami; Amir Loghmani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Does quality of life among breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis differ depending on urban and non-urban residence? A comparative study.

Authors:  Tracey DiSipio; Sandi C Hayes; Beth Newman; Joanne Aitken; Monika Janda
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Health - related quality of life of Kuwaiti women with breast cancer: a comparative study using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Shafika A Alawadi; Jude U Ohaeri
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Applying the thresholds for clinical importance for fourteen key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30: a latent class analysis of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Laura Keaver; Christopher McLaughlin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.