Literature DB >> 18695134

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue.

Ollie Minton1, Alison Richardson, Michael Sharpe, Matthew Hotopf, Patrick Stone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue is an important clinical problem. It is common, distressing, and often difficult to treat. There is a role for drug treatment of cancer-related fatigue, but no consensus has been reached on which drugs are useful. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the available evidence and make recommendations for practice and research.
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane register of controlled trials (through the second quarter 2007), Medline (January 1, 1966, through August 1, 2007), and EMBASE (January 1, 1980, through August 1, 2007) by use of a predetermined list of search terms. Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis review methodology was used for this study. The change in fatigue score on the instrument used in each study and other outcomes of interest (adverse events and withdrawal rates) were compared between treatment and control arms by use of the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: We identified 27 eligible trials of drug treatments for cancer-related fatigue (with a total of 6746 participants). The overall effect size for all drug classes was small. A meta-analysis of two studies (n = 264 patients) indicated that methylphenidate (a psychostimulant) was superior to placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD] in change in fatigue score = -0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.54 to -0.05; P = .02) for treating cancer-related fatigue. A meta-analysis of 10 studies (n = 2226 patients) evaluating erythropoietin in anemic cancer patients who were undergoing chemotherapy indicated that erythropoietin was superior to placebo (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.46 to -0.29; P = .008). Among anemic patients (four studies with n = 964 patients), improvement in fatigue was associated with darbepoetin treatment compared with placebo treatment (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI = -0.27 to 0.00; P = .05). Progestational steroids and paroxetine were no better than placebo in the treatment of cancer-related fatigue.
CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that treatment of cancer-related fatigue with methylphenidate appears to be effective. More robust evidence indicates that treatment with hematopoietic agents appears to relieve cancer-related fatigue caused by chemotherapy-induced anemia. Further confirmatory trials are required for both observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695134     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  64 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral coenzyme Q10 to relieve self-reported treatment-related fatigue in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Glenn J Lesser; Doug Case; Nancy Stark; Susan Williford; Jeff Giguere; L Astrid Garino; Michelle J Naughton; Mara Z Vitolins; Mark O Lively; Edward G Shaw
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-03

2.  Ascending caudal medullary catecholamine pathways drive sickness-induced deficits in exploratory behavior: brain substrates for fatigue?

Authors:  Ronald P A Gaykema; Lisa E Goehler
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Factors associated with response to methylphenidate in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Sriram Yennurajalingam; J Lynn Palmer; Ray Chacko; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-31

Review 4.  Psychopharmacology in psycho-oncology.

Authors:  Rosangela Caruso; Luigi Grassi; Maria Giulia Nanni; Michelle Riba
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Treating medullary thyroid cancer in the age of targeted therapy.

Authors:  Maria E Cabanillas; Mimi I Hu; Camilo Jimenez; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Gilbert J Cote
Journal:  Int J Endocr Oncol       Date:  2014

6.  Prevalence and characteristics of moderate to severe fatigue: a multicenter study in cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Xin Shelley Wang; Fengmin Zhao; Michael J Fisch; Ann M O'Mara; David Cella; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Recommendations for high-priority research on cancer-related fatigue in children and adults.

Authors:  Andrea M Barsevick; Michael R Irwin; Pamela Hinds; Andrew Miller; Ann Berger; Paul Jacobsen; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Bryce B Reeve; Karen Mustian; Ann O'Mara; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael Fisch; David Cella
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Different Phenotyping Approaches Lead to Dissimilar Biologic Profiles in Men With Chronic Fatigue After Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Li Rebekah Feng; Kristin Dickinson; Neila Kline; Leorey N Saligan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Sleep-wake functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)).

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Rebecca A Shelby; Sandra A Mitchell; Maria R Fawzy; N Chantelle Hardy; Aatif M Husain; Francis J Keefe; Andrew D Krystal; Laura S Porter; Bryce B Reeve; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Ann M Berger; Kathi Mooney; Amy Alvarez-Perez; William S Breitbart; Kristen M Carpenter; David Cella; Charles Cleeland; Efrat Dotan; Mario A Eisenberger; Carmen P Escalante; Paul B Jacobsen; Catherine Jankowski; Thomas LeBlanc; Jennifer A Ligibel; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Belinda Mandrell; Barbara A Murphy; Oxana Palesh; William F Pirl; Steven C Plaxe; Michelle B Riba; Hope S Rugo; Carolina Salvador; Lynne I Wagner; Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Finly J Zachariah; Mary Anne Bergman; Courtney Smith
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.