Literature DB >> 15454530

Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants.

Mikhajlo K Zubko1, Sandrine Guillard, David Lydall.   

Abstract

Cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage depends upon coordinated interactions between DNA repair and checkpoint pathways. Here we examine the role of DNA repair and checkpoint genes in responding to unprotected telomeres in budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. We show that Exo1 is unique among the repair genes tested because like Rad9 and Rad24 checkpoint proteins, Exo1 inhibits the growth of cdc13-1 mutants at the semipermissive temperatures. In contrast Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2, and Rad27 contribute to the vitality of cdc13-1 strains grown at permissive temperatures, while Din7, Msh2, Nuc1, Rad2, Rad52, and Yen1 show no effect. Exo1 is not required for cell cycle arrest of cdc13-1 mutants at 36 degrees but is required to maintain arrest. Exo1 affects but is not essential for the production of ssDNA in subtelomeric Y' repeats of cdc13-1 mutants. However, Exo1 is critical for generating ssDNA in subtelomeric X repeats and internal single-copy sequences. Surprisingly, and in contrast to Rad24, Exo1 is not essential to generate ssDNA in X or single-copy sequences in cdc13-1 rad9Delta mutants. We conclude that Rad24 and Exo1 regulate nucleases with different properties at uncapped telomeres and propose a model to explain our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454530      PMCID: PMC1448105          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.027904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  71 in total

1.  Mismatch repair, G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and lethality after DNA damage.

Authors:  G Aquilina; M Crescenzi; M Bignami
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  D P Toczyski; D J Galgoczy; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Defective expression of the DNA mismatch repair protein, MLH1, alters G2-M cell cycle checkpoint arrest following ionizing radiation.

Authors:  T W Davis; C Wilson-Van Patten; M Meyers; K A Kunugi; S Cuthill; C Reznikoff; C Garces; C R Boland; T J Kinsella; R Fishel; D A Boothman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  DNA hydrolytic activity associated with the Ustilago maydis REC1 gene product analyzed on hairpin oligonucleotide substrates.

Authors:  S Naureckiene; W K Holloman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair.

Authors:  D Lydall; T Weinert
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1997-11

7.  Analysis of in vivo correction of defined mismatches in the DNA mismatch repair mutants msh2, msh3 and msh6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Lühr; J Scheller; P Meyer; W Kramer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1998-02

8.  Role of yeast Rth1 nuclease and its homologs in mutation avoidance, DNA repair, and DNA replication.

Authors:  R E Johnson; G K Kovvali; L Prakash; S Prakash
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks.

Authors:  C I Nugent; G Bosco; L O Ross; S K Evans; A P Salinger; J K Moore; J E Haber; V Lundblad
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The yeast Ku heterodimer is essential for protection of the telomere against nucleolytic and recombinational activities.

Authors:  R M Polotnianka; J Li; A J Lustig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection.

Authors:  Maria Pia Longhese; Diego Bonetti; Nicola Manfrini; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  DNA damage response at functional and dysfunctional telomeres.

Authors:  Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  To trim or not to trim: progression and control of DSB end resection.

Authors:  Magda Granata; Davide Panigada; Elena Galati; Federico Lazzaro; Achille Pellicioli; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Similarities and differences between "uncapped" telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  James M Dewar; David Lydall
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Telomere-end processing: mechanisms and regulation.

Authors:  Diego Bonetti; Marina Martina; Marco Falcettoni; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Polymerase epsilon is required to maintain replicative senescence.

Authors:  Abhyuday M Deshpande; Iglika G Ivanova; Vasil Raykov; Yuan Xue; Laura Maringele
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Rif1 phosphorylation site analysis in telomere length regulation and the response to damaged telomeres.

Authors:  Jinyu Wang; Haitao Zhang; Mohammed Al Shibar; Belinda Willard; Alo Ray; Kurt W Runge
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-03-07

8.  Distinct activities of exonuclease 1 and flap endonuclease 1 at telomeric g4 DNA.

Authors:  Aarthy C Vallur; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A genome wide analysis of the response to uncapped telomeres in budding yeast reveals a novel role for the NAD+ biosynthetic gene BNA2 in chromosome end protection.

Authors:  Amanda Greenall; Guiyuan Lei; Daniel C Swan; Katherine James; Liming Wang; Heiko Peters; Anil Wipat; Darren J Wilkinson; David Lydall
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 10.  Taming the tiger by the tail: modulation of DNA damage responses by telomeres.

Authors:  David Lydall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.