Literature DB >> 15834966

Family centred decision making and non-disclosure of diagnosis in a South East Asian oncology practice.

Michael F Back1, Chan Yiong Huak.   

Abstract

AIM: To audit the extent of non-disclosure of cancer diagnosis (NDD) in South-East Asian patients referred to a Western trained oncologist, and determine the factors associated with this pattern of decision-making.
METHODS: Over a 12-month period, all new patients referred to a single radiation oncologist's practice were prospectively audited at time of the initial consultation. Data obtained included patient demographic features, tumour details, proposed treatment and decision-making process. A shared decision-making consultation was attempted but if there was a persistent request by family to avoid disclosure, then a family-centred model was adopted. Patient autonomy was maintained by formally asking desire to participate in decision-making process, and subsequent permission then sought to involve family members as surrogates. Treatment aim, predicted median survival and NDD was recorded at end of consultation. Endpoints of patient NDD and non-discussion of prognosis were audited over a 12-month period, and factors potentially associated with these endpoints were assessed.
RESULTS: Over a 12-month period 369 new patients were referred to the oncologist's practice. Forty per cent were >65 years, 84% Chinese race, and 66% non-English speaking. Lung (33%) and breast (32%) primaries were prominent. Forty-seven per cent were managed with palliative intent and 24% had expected median survivals of <6 months. NDD was recorded in 66 patients or 17% of the patient group. Quantitative discussion of prognosis was avoided in 36.8% of patients. On univariate analysis advanced patient age (p<0.001, OR=9.6, 95% CI 4.9-18.9), female sex (p=0.035, OR=1.8, 95% CI 1.04-3.1), non-English speaking (p<0.001, OR=21.4, 95% CI 5.1-89.1), palliative treatment aim (p<0.001, OR=5.9, 95% CI 3.1-11.2) and short expected median survival (p<0.001, OR=4.0, 95% CI 2.3-7.1) were associated with NDD. Advanced patient age (p<0.001, OR=7.9, 95% CI 3.6-17.5), female sex (p<0.001, OR=6.4, 95% CI 2.8-14.7), non-English speaking (p=0.010, OR=7.4, 95% CI 1.6-33.3) and palliative treatment aim (p=0.010, OR=3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.0) remained significantly associated with NDD on multivariate logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of desired NDD is evident in this Asian oncology population when a family-centred model to medical decision making is used. This data confirms that NDD and the model of decision making remains a significant ethical issue. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834966     DOI: 10.1002/pon.918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  18 in total

Review 1.  Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Donna L Berry; Barbara Cochrane; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  The fertility-related treatment choices of cancer patients: cancer-related infertility and family dynamics.

Authors:  Karrie Ann Snyder; May Kyaw Thazin; William B Pearse; Mehwish Moinuddin
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Theories of Health Care Decision Making at the End of Life: A Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Katherine Heinze; Jiayun Xu; Melissa Kurtz; Hyunjeong Park; Megan Foradori; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Use of a modified Liverpool care pathway in a tertiary Asian hospital: is there still a role for it?

Authors:  Ong Eng Koon; Shirlyn Neo Hui Shan; Sushma Shivananda; Tan Yung Ying; Arrynoer Thang; Aung Myat Kyawt; Ulina Santoso; Grace Pang Su Yin; Alethea Yee Chung Pheng; Patricia Neo Soek Hui
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey.

Authors:  Christof Schäfer; Kurt Putnik; Barbara Dietl; Peter Leiberich; Thomas H Loew; Oliver Kölbl
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erin L Mead; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Sara H Javid; Emily A Haozous; Lori Arviso Alvord; David R Flum; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The impact of culture on disclosure in differences of sex development.

Authors:  Erica M Weidler; Karen E Peterson
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Adapting ENABLE for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers in Singapore: a qualitative formative evaluation.

Authors:  Grace Meijuan Yang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Yi Han Foo; Ariel Hui Mei Chung; Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal; Laurence Tan; Chou Chuen Yu; Le Mai Khanh; Audrey Rui Xuan Koh; Irene Teo; Sungwon Yoon; Marie Bakitas
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Perceptions of healthcare professionals towards palliative care in internal medicine wards: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Jason Tay; Scott Compton; Gillian Phua; Qingyuan Zhuang; Shirlyn Neo; Guozhang Lee; Limin Wijaya; Min Chiam; Natalie Woong; Lalit Krishna
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Should Patients and Family be Involved in "Do Not Resuscitate" Decisions? Views of Oncology and Palliative Care Doctors and Nurses.

Authors:  Grace M Yang; Ann K Kwee; Lalit Krishna
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2012-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.