Literature DB >> 10945690

Pediatric surgery on the Internet: is the truth out there?

L E Chen1, R K Minkes, J C Langer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The enormous amount of unmonitored medical information on the Internet prompted this investigation into the quality of pediatric surgery information on the Internet.
METHODS: The Internet was searched for information on diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), abdominal wall defects (AWD), pediatric inguinal hernia (IH), and pectus excavatum (PE). Websites were characterized, classified, and evaluated for completeness, accuracy and bias toward or against the medical profession.
RESULTS: A total of 141 websites were evaluated (N(CDH) = 37, N(AWD) = 49, N(IH) = 26, N(PE) = 29). A total of 59.6% targeted medical professionals, and 46.8% targeted the lay population. A total of 58.2% described symptoms and diagnosis. Etiology, pathology, surgery, postoperative course, and prognosis each were addressed by under 40%. A total of 58.2% were accountable for the information presented. A total of 93.1% were incomplete, 75.7% contained accurate information, and 97.7% were positive or neutral toward medical treatment. Among diagnoses, CDH had the highest percentage of websites owned by academic institutions. PE had the highest percentage of websites owned by lay people. PE websites also were the least accurate.
CONCLUSIONS: Internet information on pediatric surgery varies significantly in quality. Lay people own most websites targeted at the lay audience, and the information may not reflect the opinions of most pediatric surgeons. Increasing use of the Internet by parents seeking medical information warrants an organized approach to ensure complete and accurate information online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10945690     DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.8723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  6 in total

1.  Internet health information use and e-mail access by parents attending a paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  R D Goldman; A Macpherson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Paging dr. Google.

Authors:  Andrew Macneily
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The quality of information on three common ENT procedures on the Internet.

Authors:  J Kulasegarah; M Harney; M Walsh; R M Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Malignant websites? Analyzing the quality of prostate cancer education web resources.

Authors:  Kevin Kobes; Ilene B Harris; Glenn Regehr; Ara Tekian; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.

Authors:  Chloe Ah-Ryung Lim; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Is the information available on the Web influencing the way parents see ENT surgical procedures?

Authors:  João Flávio Nogueira Júnior; Diego Rodrigo Hermann; Maria Laura Solferini Silva; Fábio Pires Santos; Shirley Shizue Nagata Pignatari; Aldo Cassol Stamm
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.