Literature DB >> 22199478

(2,9-Dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')diiodidocadmium.

Ismail Warad, Ahmed Boshaala, Saud I Al-Resayes, Salem S Al-Deyab, Mohamed Rzaigui.   

Abstract

In the title compound, [CdI(2)(C(14)H(12)N(2))], the mol-ecule sits on a crystallographic twofold axis. The coordination sphere of the Cd(II) atom is built of two symmetry-equivalent N atoms of one 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (dmphen) ligand and two symmetry-equivalent I atoms, thus forming a distorted tetra-hedral geometry. Inversion-related mol-ecules inter-act along the c-axis direction by π-π stacking inter-actions between the phenanthroline ring systems, with centroid-centroid distances of 3.707 (9) and 3.597 (10) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199478      PMCID: PMC3238587          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For coordination chemistry of phenanthroline derivatives and their applications, see: Miller et al. (1999 ▶); Bodoki et al. (2009 ▶); Kane-Maguire & Wheeler (2001 ▶); Shahabadi et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures involving 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, see: Alizadeh et al. (2009 ▶); Preston & Kennard (1969 ▶); Wang & Zhong (2009 ▶). For background information on π–π stacking inter­actions, see: Janiak (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[CdI2(C14H12N2)] M = 574.46 Monoclinic, a = 15.690 (3) Å b = 11.580 (2) Å c = 9.836 (5) Å β = 114.65 (4)° V = 1624.3 (9) Å3 Z = 4 Ag Kα radiation λ = 0.56087 Å μ = 2.72 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.35 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.563, T max = 0.605 6126 measured reflections 3986 independent reflections 2306 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.020 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.047 wR(F 2) = 0.127 S = 1.02 3986 reflections 88 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 1.65 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.30 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044667/pk2353sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044667/pk2353Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CdI2(C14H12N2)]F(000) = 1056
Mr = 574.46Dx = 2.349 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cAg Kα radiation, λ = 0.56087 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 15.690 (3) Åθ = 9–11°
b = 11.580 (2) ŵ = 2.72 mm1
c = 9.836 (5) ÅT = 293 K
β = 114.65 (4)°Prism, colorless
V = 1624.3 (9) Å30.35 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm
Z = 4
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer2306 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.020
graphiteθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.2°
non–profiled ω scansh = −26→25
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)k = −2→19
Tmin = 0.563, Tmax = 0.605l = −3→16
6126 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
3986 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.127H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.056P)2 + 2.6748P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3986 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
88 parametersΔρmax = 1.65 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.30 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cd10.50000.30673 (3)0.25000.04219 (11)
I10.63145 (2)0.40526 (3)0.49576 (4)0.06297 (13)
N10.4331 (2)0.1468 (3)0.3059 (3)0.0385 (6)
C10.3676 (3)0.1493 (4)0.3594 (4)0.0456 (8)
C20.3328 (3)0.0468 (5)0.3921 (5)0.0547 (10)
H20.28730.04950.42930.066*
C30.3655 (3)−0.0567 (4)0.3697 (5)0.0546 (11)
H30.3436−0.12460.39430.066*
C40.4325 (3)−0.0616 (3)0.3093 (4)0.0470 (9)
C50.4652 (2)0.0441 (3)0.2803 (4)0.0375 (7)
C60.4684 (4)−0.1672 (4)0.2796 (5)0.0571 (11)
H60.4478−0.23700.30170.069*
C70.3344 (3)0.2640 (5)0.3834 (6)0.0615 (12)
H7A0.38190.29970.46980.092*
H7B0.27820.25480.39880.092*
H7C0.32150.31160.29720.092*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cd10.0423 (2)0.03666 (19)0.0490 (2)0.0000.02046 (17)0.000
I10.0659 (2)0.0604 (2)0.0597 (2)−0.02133 (15)0.02329 (16)−0.01232 (14)
N10.0341 (13)0.0426 (16)0.0372 (15)−0.0004 (11)0.0133 (11)0.0038 (12)
C10.0387 (16)0.057 (2)0.0416 (19)−0.0006 (16)0.0175 (15)0.0072 (17)
C20.0426 (19)0.073 (3)0.045 (2)−0.010 (2)0.0150 (17)0.011 (2)
C30.054 (2)0.058 (2)0.041 (2)−0.0205 (19)0.0087 (17)0.0072 (18)
C40.053 (2)0.0424 (19)0.0335 (17)−0.0112 (16)0.0067 (16)0.0012 (15)
C50.0385 (15)0.0361 (16)0.0292 (15)−0.0038 (13)0.0053 (12)0.0004 (13)
C60.081 (3)0.0360 (18)0.044 (2)−0.0105 (19)0.016 (2)0.0021 (16)
C70.059 (2)0.070 (3)0.068 (3)0.015 (2)0.039 (2)0.009 (2)
Cd1—N1i2.305 (3)C3—C41.407 (7)
Cd1—N12.305 (3)C3—H30.9300
Cd1—I12.6907 (14)C4—C51.401 (5)
Cd1—I1i2.6907 (14)C4—C61.427 (6)
N1—C11.337 (5)C5—C5i1.447 (8)
N1—C51.355 (5)C6—C6i1.343 (11)
C1—C21.399 (6)C6—H60.9300
C1—C71.481 (6)C7—H7A0.9600
C2—C31.357 (7)C7—H7B0.9600
C2—H20.9300C7—H7C0.9600
N1i—Cd1—N173.05 (16)C4—C3—H3119.9
N1i—Cd1—I1107.48 (8)C5—C4—C3116.9 (4)
N1—Cd1—I1112.40 (8)C5—C4—C6119.8 (4)
N1i—Cd1—I1i112.40 (8)C3—C4—C6123.3 (4)
N1—Cd1—I1i107.48 (8)N1—C5—C4122.2 (4)
I1—Cd1—I1i129.82 (4)N1—C5—C5i118.6 (2)
C1—N1—C5119.9 (3)C4—C5—C5i119.2 (2)
C1—N1—Cd1125.3 (3)C6i—C6—C4121.0 (3)
C5—N1—Cd1114.9 (2)C6i—C6—H6119.5
N1—C1—C2120.6 (4)C4—C6—H6119.5
N1—C1—C7117.5 (4)C1—C7—H7A109.5
C2—C1—C7121.8 (4)C1—C7—H7B109.5
C3—C2—C1120.1 (4)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C3—C2—H2119.9C1—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—H2119.9H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C4120.2 (4)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—H3119.9
N1i—Cd1—N1—C1−179.5 (4)C2—C3—C4—C52.4 (6)
I1—Cd1—N1—C178.1 (3)C2—C3—C4—C6−178.6 (4)
I1i—Cd1—N1—C1−70.8 (3)C1—N1—C5—C4−0.6 (5)
N1i—Cd1—N1—C50.37 (17)Cd1—N1—C5—C4179.5 (3)
I1—Cd1—N1—C5−102.0 (2)C1—N1—C5—C5i178.9 (4)
I1i—Cd1—N1—C5109.1 (2)Cd1—N1—C5—C5i−1.0 (5)
C5—N1—C1—C21.3 (6)C3—C4—C5—N1−1.2 (5)
Cd1—N1—C1—C2−178.8 (3)C6—C4—C5—N1179.8 (4)
C5—N1—C1—C7−179.3 (4)C3—C4—C5—C5i179.3 (4)
Cd1—N1—C1—C70.6 (5)C6—C4—C5—C5i0.3 (6)
N1—C1—C2—C30.0 (6)C5—C4—C6—C6i−1.8 (8)
C7—C1—C2—C3−179.5 (5)C3—C4—C6—C6i179.3 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4−1.9 (6)
  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy.

Authors:  R H Blessing
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Dichlorido(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')copper(II).

Authors:  B S Wang; H Zhong
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-09-05

4.  Dibromido(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')mercury(II).

Authors:  Robabeh Alizadeh; Amene Heidari; Roya Ahmadi; Vahid Amani
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-04-02

5.  DNA interaction studies of a platinum(II) complex, PtCl(2)(NN) (NN=4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline), using different instrumental methods.

Authors:  Nahid Shahabadi; Soheila Kashanian; Mehdi Purfoulad
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.098

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Dibromido(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')cadmium.

Authors:  Ismail Warad; Ahmed Boshaala; Saud I Al-Resayes; Salem S Al-Deyab; Mohamed Rzaigui
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-11-30

2.  DNA Binding Test, X-Ray Crystal Structure, Spectral Studies, TG-DTA, and Electrochemistry of [CoX 2 (dmdphphen)] (Dmdphphen Is 2,9-Dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline, X = Cl, and NCS) Complexes.

Authors:  Mousa Al-Noaimi; Mohammed Suleiman; Hany W Darwish; Ahmed H Bakheit; Muneer Abdoh; Iyad Saadeddin; Naveen Shivalingegowda; Neartur Krishnappagowda Lokanath; Odey Bsharat; Assem Barakat; Ismail Warad
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 7.778

3.  Dichlorido(2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κ(2)N,N')mercury(II).

Authors:  Ismail Warad; Mousa Al-Noaimi; Salim F Haddad; Rema Othman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-01-19

4.  (2,9-Dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline-κ(2)N,N')bis-(thio-cyanato-κS)mercury(II).

Authors:  Ismail Warad; Taibi Ben Hadda; Belkheir Hammouti; Salim F Haddad
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.