Literature DB >> 22198530

Imperceptible electrical noise attenuates isometric plantar flexion force fluctuations with correlated reductions in postural sway.

Fernando Henrique Magalhães1, André Fabio Kohn.   

Abstract

Optimal levels of noise stimulation have been shown to enhance the detection and transmission of neural signals thereby improving the performance of sensory and motor systems. The first series of experiments in the present study aimed to investigate whether subsensory electrical noise stimulation applied over the triceps surae (TS) in seated subjects decreases torque variability during a force-matching task of isometric plantar flexion and whether the same electrical noise stimulation decreases postural sway during quiet stance. Correlation tests were applied to investigate whether the noise-induced postural sway decrease is linearly predicted by the noise-induced torque variability decrease. A second series of experiments was conducted to investigate whether there are differences in torque variability between conditions in which the subsensory electrical noise is applied only to the TS, only to the tibialis anterior (TA) and to both TS and TA, during the force-matching task with seated subjects. Noise stimulation applied over the TS muscles caused a significant reduction in force variability during the maintained isometric force paradigm and also decreased postural oscillations during quiet stance. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the reduction in force fluctuation and the decrease in postural sway with the electrical noise stimulation. This last result indicates that changes in plantar flexion force variability in response to a given subsensory random stimulation of the TS may provide an estimate of the variations in postural sway caused by the same subsensory stimulation of the TS. We suggest that the decreases in force variability and postural sway found here are due to stochastic resonance that causes an improved transmission of proprioceptive information. In the second series of experiments, the reduction in force variability found when noise was applied to the TA muscle alone did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that TS proprioception gives a better feedback to reduce force fluctuation in isometric plantar flexion conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198530     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2983-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Elias Manjarrez; Ignacio Mendez; Lourdes Martinez; Amira Flores; Claudio R Mirasso
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Stochastic resonance in the motor system: effects of noise on the monosynaptic reflex pathway of the cat spinal cord.

Authors:  Lourdes Martínez; Toni Pérez; Claudio R Mirasso; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuromusculoskeletal torque-generation process has a large destabilizing effect on the control mechanism of quiet standing.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Albert H Vette; Noritaka Kawashima; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis.

Authors:  L F Oliveira; D M Simpson; J Nadal
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Steadiness in plantar flexor muscles and its relation to postural sway in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Motoki Kouzaki; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Noise-enhanced balance control in patients with diabetes and patients with stroke.

Authors:  Attila A Priplata; Benjamin L Patritti; James B Niemi; Richard Hughes; Denise C Gravelle; Lewis A Lipsitz; Aristidis Veves; Joel Stein; Paolo Bonato; James J Collins
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  The interaction of respiration and visual feedback on the control of force and neural activation of the agonist muscle.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; Bhavini K Patel; Osmar P Neto; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Noise-enhanced balance control in older adults.

Authors:  Denise C Gravelle; Carrie A Laughton; Neel T Dhruv; Kunal D Katdare; James B Niemi; Lewis A Lipsitz; James J Collins
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effectiveness of electrical noise in reducing postural sway: a comparison between imperceptible stimulation applied to the anterior and to the posterior leg muscles.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effect of mechanical tactile noise on amplitude of visual evoked potentials: multisensory stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Ignacio Méndez-Balbuena; Nayeli Huidobro; Mayte Silva; Amira Flores; Carlos Trenado; Luis Quintanar; Oscar Arias-Carrión; Rumyana Kristeva; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Improving postural control by applying mechanical noise to ankle muscle tendons.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of sub-threshold vibratory noise on visuomotor entrainment during human walking and standing in a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Samuel A Acuña; John D Zunker; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Effects of different lower-limb sensory stimulation strategies on postural regulation-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei Teng Woo; Keith Davids; Jarmo Liukkonen; Dominic Orth; Jia Yi Chow; Timo Jaakkola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Claudio Zippenfennig; Laura Niklaus; Katrin Karger; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 7.  Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Using low levels of stochastic vestibular stimulation to improve locomotor stability.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Igor S Kofman; Yiri E De Dios; Chris Miller; Brian T Peters; Rahul Goel; Raquel Galvan-Garza; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-24

9.  D1 and D2 Inhibitions of the Soleus H-Reflex Are Differentially Modulated during Plantarflexion Force and Position Tasks.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Leonardo Abdala Elias; Cristiano Rocha da Silva; Felipe Fava de Lima; Diana Rezende de Toledo; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electro-tactile stimulation of the posterior neck induces body anteropulsion during upright stance.

Authors:  A M De Nunzio; U S Yavuz; E Martinez-Valdes; D Farina; D Falla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.