Literature DB >> 24563056

Effectiveness of electrical noise in reducing postural sway: a comparison between imperceptible stimulation applied to the anterior and to the posterior leg muscles.

Fernando Henrique Magalhães1, André Fabio Kohn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether subsensory electrical noise stimulation applied over the tibialis anterior (TA) muscles may reduce postural oscillations during quiet stance and to compare such reductions with those obtained by applying the noise stimulation over the triceps surae (TS) muscles. The rationale relies on the use of noise stimulation to enhance the sensitivity of sensory receptors, thereby improving the performance of the postural control system. As recent evidence suggested that the TA muscle might be a better source of proprioceptive information during quiet stance than the TS muscles, the main hypothesis of the present study was that subsensory noise stimulation applied to the TA muscles should be more efficient for postural stabilization than a similar stimulation to the TS.
METHODS: Participants had their postural steadiness assessed while subsensory electrical noise was applied bilaterally to their TA or TS muscles and also while the stimulation was applied bilaterally to both TA and TS muscles. No stimulation was delivered in the control condition.
RESULTS: Time-domain and frequency-domain parameters based on center of mass and center of pressure signals were significantly reduced when noise stimulation was applied to the anterior and/or to the posterior leg muscles. No consistent differences in postural sway parameters were observed among the stimulation conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first investigation showing that subsensory stimulation applied over the TA muscles alone is effective in attenuating postural sway, with TS stimulation being equally effective. These findings may have useful applications for the development of medical/rehabilitation devices designed to improve postural steadiness in people with balance impairments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563056     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2846-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  46 in total

1.  Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing.

Authors:  William H Gage; David A Winter; James S Frank; Allan L Adkin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Inversion-eversion moment arms of gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior measured in vivo.

Authors:  Sabrina S M Lee; Stephen J Piazza
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis.

Authors:  L F Oliveira; D M Simpson; J Nadal
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Steadiness in plantar flexor muscles and its relation to postural sway in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Motoki Kouzaki; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 5.  Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Noise-enhanced balance control in patients with diabetes and patients with stroke.

Authors:  Attila A Priplata; Benjamin L Patritti; James B Niemi; Richard Hughes; Denise C Gravelle; Lewis A Lipsitz; Aristidis Veves; Joel Stein; Paolo Bonato; James J Collins
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Vibration-induced extra torque during electrically-evoked contractions of the human calf muscles.

Authors:  Fernando H Magalhães; André F Kohn
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Noise-enhanced balance control in older adults.

Authors:  Denise C Gravelle; Carrie A Laughton; Neel T Dhruv; Kunal D Katdare; James B Niemi; Lewis A Lipsitz; James J Collins
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  How much does the human medial gastrocnemius muscle contribute to ankle torques outside the sagittal plane?

Authors:  Taian M M Vieira; Marco A Minetto; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Alberto Botter
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.161

View more
  17 in total

1.  A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Deepesh Kumar; Abhijit Das; Uttama Lahiri; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning.

Authors:  Carly C Sacco; Erin M Gaffney; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Improving postural control by applying mechanical noise to ankle muscle tendons.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Random noise stimulation in the treatment of patients with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Mateo A Herrera-Murillo; Mario Treviño; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.058

5.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Effects of different lower-limb sensory stimulation strategies on postural regulation-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei Teng Woo; Keith Davids; Jarmo Liukkonen; Dominic Orth; Jia Yi Chow; Timo Jaakkola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Claudio Zippenfennig; Laura Niklaus; Katrin Karger; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 8.  Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  D1 and D2 Inhibitions of the Soleus H-Reflex Are Differentially Modulated during Plantarflexion Force and Position Tasks.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Leonardo Abdala Elias; Cristiano Rocha da Silva; Felipe Fava de Lima; Diana Rezende de Toledo; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electro-tactile stimulation of the posterior neck induces body anteropulsion during upright stance.

Authors:  A M De Nunzio; U S Yavuz; E Martinez-Valdes; D Farina; D Falla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.