Literature DB >> 21546109

The interaction of respiration and visual feedback on the control of force and neural activation of the agonist muscle.

Harsimran S Baweja1, Bhavini K Patel, Osmar P Neto, Evangelos A Christou.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare force variability and the neural activation of the agonist muscle during constant isometric contractions at different force levels when the amplitude of respiration and visual feedback were varied. Twenty young adults (20-32 years, 10 men and 10 women) were instructed to accurately match a target force at 15% and 50% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with abduction of the index finger while controlling their respiration at different amplitudes (85%, 100% and 125% normal) in the presence and absence of visual feedback. Each trial lasted 22s and visual feedback was removed from 8-12 and 16-20s. Each subject performed three trials with each respiratory condition at each force level. Force variability was quantified as the standard deviation of the detrended force data. The neural activation of the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) was measured with bipolar surface electrodes placed distal to the innervation zone. Relative to normal respiration, force variability increased significantly only during high-amplitude respiration (∼63%). The increase in force variability from normal- to high-amplitude respiration was strongly associated with amplified force oscillations from 0 to 3 Hz (R(2) ranged from .68 to .84, p< .001). Furthermore, the increase in force variability was exacerbated in the presence of visual feedback at 50% MVC (vision vs. no-vision: .97 vs. .87N) and was strongly associated with amplified force oscillations from 0 to 1 Hz (R(2)= .82) and weakly associated with greater power from 12 to 30 Hz (R(2)= .24) in the EMG of the agonist muscle. Our findings demonstrate that high-amplitude respiration and visual feedback of force interact and amplify force variability in young adults during moderate levels of effort.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21546109      PMCID: PMC3202062          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  37 in total

1.  Coordination between breathing and forearm movements during sinusoidal tracking.

Authors:  D Ebert; B Rassler; H Hefter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Coordination-related changes in the rhythms of breathing and walking in humans.

Authors:  B Rassler; J Kohl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Increased voluntary drive is associated with changes in common oscillations from 13 to 60 Hz of interference but not rectified electromyography.

Authors:  Osmar P Neto; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Influences of ventilation on maximal isometric force of the finger flexors.

Authors:  Sheng Li; James J Laskin
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Respiratory and stress-induced activation of low-threshold motor units in the human trapezius muscle.

Authors:  Rolf H Westgaard; Paolo Bonato; Christian Westad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjorn Jorgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Cortical correlate of the Piper rhythm in humans.

Authors:  P Brown; S Salenius; J C Rothwell; R Hari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual control of isometric force in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D E Vaillancourt; A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Effects of visual gain on force control at the elbow and ankle.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  Imperceptible electrical noise attenuates isometric plantar flexion force fluctuations with correlated reductions in postural sway.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Magalhães; André Fabio Kohn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of inherent and incidental constraints on bimanual and social coordination.

Authors:  Yiyu Wang; Osmar Pinto Neto; Madison M Davis; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Photobiomodulation delays the onset of skeletal muscle fatigue in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  Kelly A Larkin-Kaiser; Paul A Borsa; Harsimran S Baweja; Molly A Moore; Mark D Tillman; Steven Z George; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Voluntary reduction of force variability via modulation of low-frequency oscillations.

Authors:  Seoung Hoon Park; Agostina Casamento-Moran; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Corticospinal excitability is associated with hypocapnia but not changes in cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Hartley; Cody L Watson; Philip N Ainslie; Craig D Tokuno; Matthew J Greenway; David A Gabriel; Deborah D O'Leary; Stephen S Cheung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Low-Frequency Oscillations and Control of the Motor Output.

Authors:  Neha Lodha; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Modulation of force below 1 Hz: age-associated differences and the effect of magnified visual feedback.

Authors:  Emily J Fox; Harsimran S Baweja; Changki Kim; Deanna M Kennedy; David E Vaillancourt; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.