Literature DB >> 22197118

Aortic valve calcium score as a predictor for outcome after TAVI using the CoreValve revalving system.

Alexander W Leber1, Markus Kasel, Thomas Ischinger, Ulrich H Ebersberger, Diethmar Antoni, Martin Schmidt, Gotthard Riess, Vivian Renz, Armin Huber, Thomas Helmberger, Ellen Hoffmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TAVI is a novel treatment option for patients at too high risk for surgery. Risk scores for surgical valve replacement failed to accurately predict outcomes after TAVI and alternative risk parameters are lacking so far.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the CT-derived aortic valve calcification score as a predictor for outcome during and after TAVI.
METHODS: Transfemoral TAVI using the CoreValve device was performed in 68 patients, in whom the aortic valve calcium score was determined from preprocedural 64-sclice ECG gated CT-scans.
RESULTS: 30-day MACE rate (death, stroke, MI) was 10.3%, 1-year mortality was 11.8%. Using linear regression analysis the aortic valve calcium score was the only significant predictor for 30-day MACE and for 1-year mortality and was also associated with the incidence and severity of post procedural aortic regurgitation (r=0.33, p<0.05). Patients withvalve calcium scores >750 had a significant lower 1-year survival rate compared to patients with scores <750 (58% vs. 98%, p<0.05). The aortic valve calcium score is also inversely associated with the absolute improvement of NYHA-class after TAVI (regression coefficient=-0.43, p<0.02).
CONCLUSION: The degree of aortic valve calcification is associated with post procedural aortic regurgitation, procedural complications, 1-year mortality and with the degree of functional improvement of patients who underwent TAVI using the CoreValve device. Due to the fact that the aortic valve calcium score can be determined from CT-datasets that are used for preprocedural planning, this parameter may be incorporated in the general work up and may be used for risk stratification and patient selection.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197118     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  23 in total

1.  Total endoscopic sutureless aortic valve replacement: rationale, development, perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Vola; Jean-Francois Fuzellier; Salvatore Campisi; Daniel Grinberg; Jean-Noël Albertini; Jerôme Morel; Antoine Gerbay
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  The revised EuroSCORE II for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Alexander Sedaghat; Jan-Malte Sinning; Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Alexander Ghanem; Christoph Hammerstingl; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Michele Gallo; Eduardo Bernabeu; Augusto D'Onofrio; Vincenzo Tarzia; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Aortic valve calcium load before TAVI: Is it important?

Authors:  Martin Haensig; Ardawan Julian Rastan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Comparison of outcomes using balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter prostheses according to the extent of aortic valve calcification.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Johannes Blumenstein; Christoph Liebetrau; Andreas Rolf; Luise Gaede; Arnaud Van Linden; Mani Arsalan; Mirko Doss; Jan G P Tijssen; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Transcatheter Valve Underexpansion Limits Leaflet Durability: Implications for Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis valve implantation and bicuspid valve anatomy: an unsolved dilemma?

Authors:  Marco Vola; Jean-Baptiste Guichard; Salvatore Campisi; Jean-François Fuzellier; Antoine Gerbay; Fabien Doguet; Karl Isaaz; Kasra Azarnoush; Amedeo Anselmi; Vito Giovani Ruggieri
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Paravalvular regurgitation following transcutaneous aortic valve replacement: predictors and clinical significance.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; Philippe Généreux; Martin Leon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Hoda Hatoum; Arash Kheradvar; Ramin Zareian; S Hamed Alavi; Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Edwards Sapien XT valve placement as treatment option for aortic regurgitation after transfemoral CoreValve implantation: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Patrick Diemert; Philipp Lange; Martin Greif; Moritz Seiffert; Lenard Conradi; Steffen Massberg; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Christian Hagl; Christoph Schmitz; Holger Schröfel; Hendrik Treede; Gerhard Schymik; Christian Kupatt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.