Literature DB >> 22194501

Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Wendie A Berg1, Kathleen S Madsen, Kathy Schilling, Marie Tartar, Etta D Pisano, Linda Hovanessian Larsen, Deepa Narayanan, Judith E Kalinyak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the performance of positron emission mammography (PEM) with that of MRI in the evaluation of the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seventy-two women with newly diagnosed breast cancer offered breast-conserving surgery from September 2006 through November 2008 consented to participate in a multicenter protocol. Participants underwent contrast-enhanced breast MRI and 18F-FDG PEM in randomized order, and the examinations were interpreted independently. The performance characteristics of the imaging modalities were compared using the McNemar test and generalized estimating equations. A retrospective blinded review of PEM images was performed by four experienced observers to understand the reasons for false-negatives.
RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-seven women (median age, 58 years; age range, 26-93 years) eligible for analysis completed the appropriate follow-up for study inclusion. Fifteen women (4.1%) were found to have contralateral cancer (11 invasive [mean tumor size, 12 mm; median, 10 mm; range, 1-22 mm] and four ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 15 cases, both PEM and MRI showed three (20%), only MRI showed 11 (73%), and one (6.7%) was found at prophylactic mastectomy. MRI sensitivity at 14 of 15 (93%; 95% CI, 66-94) was higher than PEM at three of 15 (20%; 95% CI, 5.3-46) (p<0.001). On PEM, three additional cancers were seen prospectively but were considered probably benign and two other cancers were visible in retrospect at the site. Of 352 contralateral breasts without cancer, findings were negative or benign on PEM for 335 (95.2%; 95% CI, 92.2-97.0), which is more than MRI at 315 (89.5%; 95% CI, 85.7-92.4; p=0.002). The positive predictive value (PPV) of PEM-prompted biopsies (3/14 [21%]) was not significantly different from the PPV of MRI (15/54 [28%], p=0.58). On blinded retrospective PEM review of the 15 contralateral cancers, PEM findings for 11 (73%) were considered suspicious.
CONCLUSION: Contralateral cancer was found in 15 of 367 women (4.1%), with MRI showing 14 (93%). Eleven contralateral cancers (73%) were visible on PEM, but only three (20%) were recognized prospectively as suspicious. Lesions that are visible on PEM should be viewed as suspicious unless known to be benign by prior breast imaging or biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22194501     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.6342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Clinical utility of positron emission mammography.

Authors:  Shannon B Glass; Zeeshan A Shah
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Michael K O'Connor; James P Moriarty; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?

Authors:  Eugene Ong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 5.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  [Molecular breast imaging. An update].

Authors:  K Pinker; T H Helbich; H Magometschnigg; B Fueger; P Baltzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Collimator design for a dedicated molecular breast imaging-guided biopsy system: proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Amanda L Weinmann; Carrie B Hruska; Amy L Conners; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT.

Authors:  Judith E Kalinyak; Wendie A Berg; Kathy Schilling; Kathleen S Madsen; Deepa Narayanan; Marie Tartar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

10.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET.

Authors:  B B Koolen; W V Vogel; M J T F D Vrancken Peeters; C E Loo; E J Th Rutgers; R A Valdés Olmos
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.