Literature DB >> 22192114

Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons.

Costas D Lallas1, John W Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Virtual reality (VR) simulation has the potential to standardize surgical training for robotic surgery. We sought to evaluate all commercially available VR robotic simulators.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE(®) literature search was performed of all applicable keywords. Available VR simulators were evaluated with regard to face, content, and construct validation. Additionally, a survey was e-mailed to all members of the Endourological Society, querying the pervasiveness of VR simulators in robotic surgical training. Finally, each company was e-mailed to ask for a price quote for their respective system.
RESULTS: There are four VR robotic surgical simulators currently available: RoSS™, dV-Trainer™, SEP Robot™, and da Vinci(®) Skills Simulator™. Each system is represented in the literature and all possess varying degrees of face, content, and construct validity. Although all systems have basic skill sets with performance analysis and metrics software, most do not contain procedural components. When evaluating the results of our survey, most respondents did not possess a VR simulator although almost all believed there to be great potential for these devices in robotic surgical training. With the exception of the SEP Robot, all VR simulators are similar in price.
CONCLUSIONS: VR simulators have a definite role in the future of robotic surgical training. Although the simulators target technical components of training, their largest impact will be appreciated when incorporated into a comprehensive educational curriculum.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192114     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.

Authors:  John W Davis; Usha S Kreaden; Jessica Gabbert; Raju Thomas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The effects of fatigue on robotic surgical skill training in Urology residents.

Authors:  James R Mark; Douglas C Kelly; Edouard J Trabulsi; Patrick J Shenot; Costas D Lallas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-05-14

Review 4.  Evolution and literature review of robotic general surgery resident training 2002-2018.

Authors:  David L Crawford; Anthony Michael Dwyer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 5.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Virtual reality surgical simulators- a prerequisite for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Anupama Rajanbabu; Laura Drudi; Susie Lau; Joshua Z Press; Walter H Gotlieb
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-30

7.  Virtual Laparoscopic Training System Based on VCH Model.

Authors:  Jiangzhou Tang; Lang Xu; Longjun He; Songluan Guan; Xing Ming; Qian Liu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 8.  Bringing excellence into urology: How to improve the future training of residents?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Sabina Sevcenco; Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas; Christian Bach; Noor Buchholz; Fabian Adams; Konrad Wilhelm; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-23

9.  How does a surgeon's brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Carlo Moretto; Silvia Tognazzi; Lucia Briscese; Megi Naraci; Letizia Leocani; Franco Mosca; Mauro Ferrari; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Virtual-Reality Robotic Surgery Simulators.

Authors:  Alexandria M Hertz; Evalyn I George; Christine M Vaccaro; Timothy C Brand
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.