| Literature DB >> 22186925 |
Tomasz L Nosewicz1, Mikel L Reilingh, C Niek van Dijk, Georg N Duda, Hanna Schell.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is unknown what causes donor site morbidity following the osteochondral autograft transfer procedure or how donor sites heal. Contact pressure and edge loading at donor sites may play a role in the healing process. It was hypothesized that an artificially created osteochondral defect in a weightbearing area of an ovine femoral condyle will cause osseous bridging of the defect from the upper edges, resulting in incomplete and irregular repair of the subchondral bone plate.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22186925 PMCID: PMC3445791 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1831-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342
Histological grading score A (cartilage and subchondral bone plate repair)
| Category (points) |
|---|
|
|
| 80–100% (8) |
| 60–80% (6) |
| 40–60% (4) |
| 20–40% (2) |
| 0–20% (0) |
|
|
| Surface regularity |
| Smooth and intact (2) |
| Fissures (1) |
| Fibrillation, severe disruption (0) |
| Structural integrity |
| Normal (2) |
| Slight disruption, including cysts (1) |
| Severe lack of integration (0) |
| Cartilage thickness (% of surrounding normal cartilage) |
| 100% (2) |
| 50–100% or more (1) |
| 0–50% (0) |
| Bonding to adjacent cartilage |
| Bonded to both sides (2) |
| Bonded to one side; partially bonded to both sides (1) |
| Not bonded (0) |
|
|
| Normal cellularity, no chondrocyte clustering (2) |
| Light hypocellularity, <25% chondrocyte clustering (1) |
| Moderate hypocellularity, >25% chondrocyte clustering (0) |
|
|
| Normal cellularity, no chondrocyte clustering, normal staining (3) |
| Normal cellularity, few chondrocyte clustering, moderate staining (2) |
| Mild or moderate hypocellularity, slight staining (1) |
| Severe hypocellularity, many chondrocyte clustering, no staining (0) |
|
|
| Complete reconstruction (2) |
| More than 50% reconstruction (1) |
| 50% or less reconstruction (0) |
|
|
| Fully and not interrupted (2) |
| <100% but >50% (1) |
| <50% (0) |
|
|
| >80% homogeneous positive staining (2) |
| 40–80% homogeneous positive staining (1) |
| <40% homogeneous positive staining (0) |
|
|
Histological grading score B (subchondral bone repair)
| Category (points) |
|---|
|
|
| 91–110% (4) |
| 76–90% (3) |
| 51–75% (2) |
| 26–50% (1) |
| <25% (0) |
|
|
| Bonded at both sides (2) |
| Bonded at one side, partially at both sides (1) |
| No bonding (0) |
|
|
| 91–100% (3) |
| 70–90% (2) |
| 50–70% (1) |
| <50% (0) |
|
|
Fig. 1Subchondral bone plate restoration stages. In these Safranin O/Fast Green stained samples, mineralized bone and fibrous tissue appear bluish green, whereas (fibro)cartilage appears red. Scale bars represent the diameter of the initial osteochondral defect. a In stage 1 (n = 3), the defect was continuous with the synovial cavity, with no signs of defect bridging. Notice the extensive (fibro)cartilage collapse (white horizontal arrows) and erosion of bone outside the perimeters of the initially created defect (black vertical arrows). b In stage 2 (n = 5), fibrous tissue bridging or minor circumferential subchondral bone plate restoration was present. The main difference with stage 1 was the formation of fibrous strands in an attempt to partially close the created defect (white vertical arrow). Again, collapse of (fibro)cartilage (white horizontal arrow) and subchondral bone (white arrowhead), coupled to osseous erosion (black vertical arrows), was seen frequently. Already, the first signs of a central irregularly shaped cavitary lesion were seen. This lesion was either empty or filled with connective tissue. In some samples, central vacuolization of the fibrous tissue was present. c In stage 3 (n = 6), there was still inward collapse of subchondral bone and (fibro)cartilage. Progressive subchondral bone plate restoration was observed. Notice the evident subchondral bone sclerosis (black arrowhead). The central cavitary lesion, which was nearly closed, either was lined with fibrous tissue or showing exposed bone. d In stage 4 (n = 10), there was complete sclerotic osseous bridging of the defect, with mostly a concave fibrocartilaginous articular surface, and a central cavitary lesion which was either empty or filled with fibrous tissue. Again, cartilage flow and subchondral bone sclerosis were present
Fig. 2Subchondral bone plate restoration in stage 4 Safranin O/Van Kossa stained samples. Mineralized bone appears black, and (fibro)cartilage and fibrous tissue appear red. Scale bars represent the diameter of the initial osteochondral defect. The subchondral bone plate was characterized by irregular restoration, compromised by fibrocartilage flow (white arrows), the underlying cavitary lesion (black arrow) and subchondral bone plate advancement (arrowheads)
Histological and histomorphometric results for the native and osteochondral defect (OCD) group
| Time (months) | Group | Histology | Histomorphometry | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score A | Score B | OC’s | Unfilled area | Mineralized bone | ||
| 3 | Native | 27* | 9* | 4 ± 6 (0–18) | 0 § | 46.8 ± 8.0 (36.4–58.3) |
| OCD | 3.8 ± 3.4 (1–11) †;‡ | 3.8 ± 3.3 (0–9) ‡ | 79 ± 50 (11–156) ‡ | 16.1 ± 13.5 (2.0–41.7) †,‡ | 25.3 ± 18.4 (5.0–54.7) ‡ | |
| 6 | Native | 27* | 9* | 2 ± 4 (0–11) | 0 § | 43.9 ± 6.5 (37.1–56.2) |
| OCD | 10.7 ± 6.2 (1–22) †,‡ | 4.2 ± 2.3 (0–7) ‡ | 50 ± 23 (17–86) ‡ | 3.1 ± 2.2 (0.8–7.1) †,‡ | 37.4 ± 12.5 (16.5–53.4) | |
The amount of tissue is in percentage points of the region of interest. All data are displayed as mean ± SD (range), unless otherwise specified. Native samples received the maximum amount of points for score A and B (*). Native samples did not display any unfilled area (§). † P < 0.05 (difference in same group between 3 and 6 months). ‡ P < 0.05 (compared to native)