| Literature DB >> 22184536 |
Marianne Schoorl1, Piet C M Bartels, Mareille Gritters, Donna Fluitsma, René Musters, Menso J Nubé.
Abstract
During haemodialysis (HD), platelets (PLTs) are activated and release granule contents. As HD treatment occurs three times a week, it has been demonstrated that PLTs are exhausted due to the repetitive character of the treatment. To identify PLT depletion morphologically, PLT evaluation was performed by light microscopy and electron microscopy (EM) in a chronic HD subject and a healthy reference subject. Blood samples were taken before the start of HD treatment for measurement of PLT count, PLT volume and size parameters. Blood smears were screened by light microscopy for qualitative evaluation of PLT granule containing cytoplasm, as indicated by its staining density. Morphological PLT parameters of surface area and size of dense bodies were assessed by EM. Data were compared with results of a group of 20 chronic HD subjects and a group of 20 healthy reference subjects. With respect to the percentage of PLTs with appropriate staining density (>75%), light microscopic evaluation showed that this value (9%) was within the range of a group of chronic HD subjects, but considerably below the reference range (70%). EM evaluation revealed an average PLT surface area and dense bodies area of respectively 42% and 31%, if the healthy reference subject was set on 100%. PLTs from a chronic HD subject are considerably smaller and substantially less granular than PLTs from a healthy reference subject. These findings support the hypothesis of PLT depletion in chronic HD subjects due to frequent PLT activation and/or increased urea concentrations.Entities:
Keywords: electron microscopy; haemodialysis.; platelet activation; platelet degranulation
Year: 2011 PMID: 22184536 PMCID: PMC3238486 DOI: 10.4081/hr.2011.e15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Rep ISSN: 2038-8322
Figure 1Light microscopic evaluation of PLTs with appropriate (>75%, left) and with decreased (<25%, right) staining density of the granule-containing cytoplasma. Magnification: 600×.
Laboratory, light microscopic and EM data from a HD subject and healthy reference subject. For comparison data of the groups of 20 chronic HD subjects and 20 healthy reference subjects are used.[4]
| HD Subject | HD subjects’ group[ | Healthy reference subject | Healthy reference group[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLT (109/L) | 206 | 198 (117–229) | 254 | 238 (150–337) |
| PDW (fL) | 11.3 | 9.5 (7.7–11.4) | 12.1 | 11.7 (9.5–14.1) |
| MPV (fL) | 10.0 | 10.5 (9.1–11.8) | 10.3 | 10.1 (8.9–11.6) |
| P-LCR (%) | 23.4 | 29.0 (16.9–40.1) | 27.2 | 25.2 (15.2–37.3) |
| Light microscopic evaluation: | ||||
| % PLTs with > 75% | 8 | 19 (4–41) | 72 | 70 (44–86) |
| staining density | ||||
| EM evaluation: | ||||
| average PLT surface | 242.481 | 576.533 | ||
| area ( # pixels) | ||||
| area of dense bodies | ||||
| per PLT (%) | 31 | 100 |
Figure 2(A) Digital mask of electron microscopic PLT evaluation of a HD subject and (B) healthy reference subject. Masks are shown in blue. Magnification: 2500×.