Literature DB >> 22184479

Slipping Anchor? Testing the Vignettes Approach to Identification and Correction of Reporting Heterogeneity.

Teresa Bago d'Uva1, Maarten Lindeboom, Owen O'Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer.   

Abstract

We propose tests of the two assumptions under which anchoring vignettes identify heterogeneity in reporting of categorical evaluations. Systematic variation in the perceived difference between any two vignette states is sufficient to reject vignette equivalence. Response consistency - the respondent uses the same response scale to evaluate the vignette and herself - is testable given sufficiently comprehensive objective indicators that independently identify response scales. Both assumptions are rejected for reporting of cognitive and physical functioning in a sample of older English individuals, although a weaker test resting on less stringent assumptions does not reject response consistency for cognition.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22184479      PMCID: PMC3241933          DOI: 10.1353/jhr.2011.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Resour        ISSN: 0022-166X


  18 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Analysis of the validity of the vignette approach to correct for heterogeneity in reporting health system responsiveness.

Authors:  Nigel Rice; Silvana Robone; Peter Smith
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-28

3.  Why Danes are smug: comparative study of life satisfaction in the European Union.

Authors:  Kaare Christensen; Anne Maria Herskind; James W Vaupel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-23

4.  Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities?

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Eddy Van Doorslaer; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  CAMCOG--a concise neuropsychological test to assist dementia diagnosis: socio-demographic determinants in an elderly population sample.

Authors:  F A Huppert; C Brayne; C Gill; E S Paykel; L Beardsall
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-11

7.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; E M Simonsick; L Ferrucci; R J Glynn; L F Berkman; D G Blazer; P A Scherr; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-03

8.  Restricted activity among community-living older persons: incidence, precipitants, and health care utilization.

Authors:  T M Gill; M M Desai; E A Gahbauer; T R Holford; C S Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Physical activity, including walking, and cognitive function in older women.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Jae Hee Kang; JoAnn E Manson; Monique M B Breteler; James H Ware; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Validating the Use of Anchoring Vignettes for the Correction of Response Scale Differences in Subjctive Questions.

Authors:  Arthur Van Soest; Liam Delaney; Colm Harmon; Arie Kapteyn; James P Smith
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

View more
  16 in total

1.  Education-related inequity in healthcare with heterogeneous reporting of health.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  Analysis of the validity of the vignette approach to correct for heterogeneity in reporting health system responsiveness.

Authors:  Nigel Rice; Silvana Robone; Peter Smith
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-28

3.  Are Americans Really Less Happy With Their Incomes?

Authors:  Arie Kapteyn; James P Smith; Arie van Soest
Journal:  Rev Income Wealth       Date:  2013-03-01

4.  Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency.

Authors:  Nicole Au; Paula K Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  In Pursuit of Anchoring Vignettes That Work: Evaluating Generality Versus Specificity in Vignette Texts.

Authors:  Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Poor Health Reporting? Using Anchoring Vignettes to Uncover Health Disparities by Wealth and Race.

Authors:  Laura Rossouw; Teresa Bago d'Uva; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-10

7.  Reporting Heterogeneity and Health Disparities Across Gender and Education Levels: Evidence From Four Countries.

Authors:  Teresa Molina
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-04

8.  Age and Sex Effects in Anchoring Vignette Studies: Methodological and Empirical Contributions.

Authors:  Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
Journal:  Surv Res Methods       Date:  2014

9.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Anchoring Vignettes in Bias Reduction for Socioeconomic Disparities in Self-Rated Health among Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Hongwei Xu; Yu Xie
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Promises and Pitfalls of Anchoring Vignettes in Health Survey Research.

Authors:  Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk; Emese Verdes-Tennant; Mary McEniry; Márton Ispány
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.