Literature DB >> 27721523

Assessing the Effectiveness of Anchoring Vignettes in Bias Reduction for Socioeconomic Disparities in Self-Rated Health among Chinese Adults.

Hongwei Xu1, Yu Xie2.   

Abstract

This study investigates how reporting heterogeneity may bias socioeconomic and demographic disparities in self-rated general health, a widely used health indicator, and how such bias can be adjusted by using new anchoring vignettes designed in the 2012 wave of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). We find systematic variation by socio-demographic characteristics in thresholds used by respondents in rating their general health status. Such threshold shifts are often non-parallel in that the effect of a certain group characteristic on the shift is stronger at one level than another. We find that the resulting bias of measuring group differentials in self-rated health can be too substantial to be ignored. We demonstrate that the CFPS anchoring vignettes prove to be an effective survey instrument in obtaining bias-adjusted estimates of health disparities not only for the CFPS sample, but also for an independent sample from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Effective adjustment for reporting heterogeneity may require vignette administration only to a small subsample (20-30% of the full sample). Using a single vignette can be as effective as using more in terms of anchoring, but the results are sensitive to the choice of vignette design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; anchoring vignettes; reporting heterogeneity; self-rated health; socioeconomic status

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721523      PMCID: PMC5053179          DOI: 10.1177/0081175015599808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  27 in total

1.  Education-related inequity in healthcare with heterogeneous reporting of health.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  Provincial income inequality and self-reported health status in China during 1991-7.

Authors:  X Pei; E Rodriguez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities?

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Eddy Van Doorslaer; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Socioeconomic status and health among the aged in the United States and Germany: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Günther Lüschen; William C Cockerham; Johannes Siegrist
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Does self-reported health bias the measurement of health inequalities in U.S. adults? Evidence using anchoring vignettes from the Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Jennifer Beam Dowd; Megan Todd
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Authors:  Yaohui Zhao; Yisong Hu; James P Smith; John Strauss; Gonghuan Yang
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Using anchoring vignettes to assess group differences in general self-rated health.

Authors:  Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk; Jeremy Freese; Robert M Hauser
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2011-06

9.  Self-ratings of health among the old and the old-old.

Authors:  K F Ferraro
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1980-12

10.  Validating the Use of Anchoring Vignettes for the Correction of Response Scale Differences in Subjctive Questions.

Authors:  Arthur Van Soest; Liam Delaney; Colm Harmon; Arie Kapteyn; James P Smith
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

View more
  4 in total

1.  Research in and Prospects for the Measurement of Health Using Self-Rated Health.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2016-09-16

2.  Subjective social status and trajectories of self-rated health status: a comparative analysis of Japan and the United States.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Takahashi; Takeo Fujiwara; Takeo Nakayama; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in China: A Reassessment with Data from the 2010-2012 China Family Panel Studies.

Authors:  Hongwei Xu; Yu Xie
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2016-01-25

4.  Is the single self-rated health item reliable in India? A construct validity study.

Authors:  Stéphane Cullati; Simantini Mukhopadhyay; Stefan Sieber; Achin Chakraborty; Claudine Burton-Jeangros
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.