Literature DB >> 23997312

Are Americans Really Less Happy With Their Incomes?

Arie Kapteyn1, James P Smith, Arie van Soest.   

Abstract

Recent economic research on international comparisons of subjective well-being suffers from several important biases due to the potential incomparability of response scales within and across countries. In this paper we concentrate on self-reported satisfaction with income in two countries: The Netherlands and the US. The comparability problem is addressed by using anchoring vignettes. We find that in the raw data, Americans appear decidedly less satisfied with their income than the Dutch. It turns out however that after response scale adjustment based on vignettes, the distribution of satisfaction in the two countries is essentially identical. In addition, we find that the within-country cross-sectional effect of income on satisfaction-a key parameter in the recent debate in the economic literature-is significantly under-estimated especially in the US-when differences in response scales are not taken into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  happiness; life satisfaction; reporting bias; vignettes

Year:  2013        PMID: 23997312      PMCID: PMC3758483          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00532.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Income Wealth        ISSN: 0034-6586


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of the validity of the vignette approach to correct for heterogeneity in reporting health system responsiveness.

Authors:  Nigel Rice; Silvana Robone; Peter Smith
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-28

2.  Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities?

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Eddy Van Doorslaer; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll.

Authors:  Angus Deaton
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2008

4.  Slipping Anchor? Testing the Vignettes Approach to Identification and Correction of Reporting Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Maarten Lindeboom; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  J Hum Resour       Date:  2011

5.  Validating the Use of Anchoring Vignettes for the Correction of Response Scale Differences in Subjctive Questions.

Authors:  Arthur Van Soest; Liam Delaney; Colm Harmon; Arie Kapteyn; James P Smith
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes.

Authors:  Joshua A Salomon; Ajay Tandon; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Analysis of the validity of the vignette approach to correct for heterogeneity in reporting health system responsiveness.

Authors:  Nigel Rice; Silvana Robone; Peter Smith
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-28

2.  Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency.

Authors:  Nicole Au; Paula K Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings.

Authors:  Gus O'Donnell; Andrew J Oswald
Journal:  Ecol Econ       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 5.389

4.  The association between depressive symptoms and self-reported sleep difficulties among college students: Truth or reporting bias?

Authors:  Zhiyong Huang; Fabrice Kämpfen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An extended hierarchical ordered probit model robust to heteroskedastic vignette perceptions with an application to functional limitation assessment.

Authors:  Zhiyong Huang; Haoxian Wang; Wenyuan Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Scale Norming Undermines the Use of Life Satisfaction Scale Data for Welfare Analysis.

Authors:  Mark Fabian
Journal:  J Happiness Stud       Date:  2021-10-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.