Literature DB >> 21715544

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: remission using modern criteria, complications, and predictors of outcome.

John A Jane1, Robert M Starke, Mohamed A Elzoghby, Davis L Reames, Spencer C Payne, Michael O Thorner, John C Marshall, Edward R Laws, Mary Lee Vance.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite the growing application of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS), outcomes for GH adenomas are not clearly defined.
OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience with ETSS with specific interest in remission rates using the 2010 consensus criteria, predictors of remission, and associated complications. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This was a retrospective single institution study. PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Sixty acromegalic patients who underwent ETSS were identified. Remission was defined as a normal IGF-I and either a suppressed GH less than 0.4 ng/ml during an oral glucose tolerance test or a random GH less than 1.0 ng/ml.
RESULTS: Remission was achieved in all 14 microadenomas and 28 of 46 macroadenomas (61%). Tumor size, age, gender, and history of prior surgery were not predictive on multivariant analysis. In hospital postoperative morning GH levels less than 2.5 ng/ml provided the best prediction of remission (P < 0.001). Preoperative variables predictive of remission included Knosp score (P = 0.017), IGF-I (P = 0.030), and GH (P = 0.042) levels. New endocrinopathy consisted of diabetes insipidus in 5%, adrenal insufficiency in 5.4%, and new hypogonadism in 29% of men and 17% of women. However, 41% of hypogonadal men had normal postoperative testosterone levels and 83% of amenorrheic women regained menses. The most common complaints after surgery were sinonasal (36 of 60, 60%) resolving in all but two.
CONCLUSIONS: ETSS for GH adenomas is associated with high rates of remission and a low incidence of new endocrinopathy. Despite the panoramic views offered by the endoscope, invasive tumors continue to have lower rates of remission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715544     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  70 in total

1.  Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: an interesting alternative to stereotactic radiosurgery in acromegaly.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Kuhn; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and early criteria of remission in acromegaly.

Authors:  Ximene Antunes; Nina Ventura; Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Andre Guasti; Paulo José M Pereira; Aline Helen Silva Camacho; Leila Chimelli; Paulo Niemeyer; Mônica R Gadelha; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Impact of pre-treatment with somatostatin analogs on surgical management of acromegalic patients referred to a single center.

Authors:  Susanna Bacigaluppi; Federico Gatto; Pasquale Anania; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Giulia Benvegnu; Elena Nazzari; Renato Spaziante; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone; Gianluigi Zona
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Monica R Gadelha; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Marcello D Bronstein; Federico Gatto; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for resection of pituitary adenomas: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshareef; Stephen Lowe; Yeonhee Park; Bruce Frankel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: outcomes in 53 patients using 2010 consensus criteria for remission.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Matthew J Tormenti; Alessandro Paluzzi; William E Rothfus; Yue-Fang Chang; Hanady Zainah; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman; Sue M Challinor; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Acromegaly in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Irene Gagliardi; Sabrina Chiloiro; Ana Gonçalves Ferreira; Marta Bondanelli; Antonella Giampietro; Antonio Bianchi; Laura De Marinis; Maria Fleseriu; Maria Chiara Zatelli
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Dawn Shao Ting Lim; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Iglesias; Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal; Juan José Díez
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 10.  New therapeutic agents for acromegaly.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.