Literature DB >> 19178529

Monitoring disease activity using GH and IGF-I in the follow-up of 501 patients with acromegaly.

M Sherlock1, A Aragon Alonso, R C Reulen, J Ayuk, R N Clayton, G Holder, M C Sheppard, A Bates, P M Stewart.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The aims of treatment in patients with acromegaly are to achieve serum GH/IGF-I concentrations associated with cure or normalization of mortality and alleviation of symptoms. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Using the West Midlands Acromegaly database (n = 501) we investigated the reliability of basal fasting GH in predicting nadir or mean GH during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or GH day curve (GHDC), respectively, the degree of discordance between disease activity measured by GH and IGF-I values and the effect of radiotherapy on the above relationships. In total 773 OGTT and 507 GHDC were performed.
RESULTS: Basal fasting GH was strongly correlated with nadir/mean GH on OGTT/GHDC (r = +0.87, P < 0.0001, r = +0.93, P < 0.0001, respectively). A basal GH < 2.5 microg/l was associated with a nadir/mean GH during OGTT/GHDC < 2.5 microg/l in 98.6% and 88.2% of cases, respectively. Elevated IGF-I was seen in 32.4% and 46.4% of patients with GH nadir values during OGTT < 1 and < 2.5 microg/l, respectively, and in 21.2% and 45.9% of GHDC with mean GH < 1 and < 2.5 microg/l, respectively. Radiotherapy increased the discordance in GH and IGF-I as markers of disease activity at GH < 2.5 microg/l (elevated IGF-I-values when OGTT nadir GH < 2.5 microg/l: radiotherapy 55.5%vs. no radiotherapy 36.9%, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a close relationship between a basal fasting GH < 2.5 microg/l and nadir/mean GH < 2.5 microg/l during OGTT/GHDC. There is a large discordance between disease activity when assessed by GH and IGF-I which is further increased by radiotherapy. These observations illustrate the challenge of defining appropriate biochemical end-points to achieve control of disease and normalization of mortality in acromegaly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19178529     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  11 in total

Review 1.  The changing face of acromegaly--advances in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Ariel Barkan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Discordant growth hormone and IGF-1 levels post pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly naïve to medical therapy and radiation: what to follow, GH or IGF-1 values?

Authors:  Jessica A Brzana; Chris G Yedinak; Johnny B Delashaw; Hume S Gultelkin; David Cook; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Assessment of biochemical control of acromegaly during treatment with somatostatin analogues by oral glucose load and insulin-like growth factor I.

Authors:  M Scacchi; C Carzaniga; G Vitale; L M Fatti; F Pecori Giraldi; M Andrioli; A Cattaneo; F Cavagnini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time.

Authors:  Alireza Ghajar; Pamela S Jones; Francisco J Guarda; Alex Faje; Nicholas A Tritos; Karen K Miller; Brooke Swearingen; Lisa B Nachtigall
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Prognostic value of nadir GH levels for long-term biochemical remission or recurrence in surgically treated acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Simran Singh; Yessica DeLeon; Zhezhen Jin; Alexander G Khandji; Serge Cremers; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Multiple facets in the control of acromegaly.

Authors:  Lucio Vilar; Alex Valenzuela; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Claudia M Gómez Giraldo; Doly Pantoja; Marcello D Bronstein
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database.

Authors:  Patrick Petrossians; Adrian F Daly; Emil Natchev; Luigi Maione; Karin Blijdorp; Mona Sahnoun-Fathallah; Renata Auriemma; Alpha M Diallo; Anna-Lena Hulting; Diego Ferone; Vaclav Hana; Silvia Filipponi; Caroline Sievers; Claudia Nogueira; Carmen Fajardo-Montañana; Davide Carvalho; Vaclav Hana; Günter K Stalla; Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Réa; Brigitte Delemer; Annamaria Colao; Thierry Brue; Sebastian J C M M Neggers; Sabina Zacharieva; Philippe Chanson; Albert Beckers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 10.  Updates in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly.

Authors:  Roula Zahr; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.