Literature DB >> 22182660

Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs.

Felipe E Campos1, Julio B Gomes, Charles Marin, Hellen S Teixeira, Marcelo Suzuki, Lukasz Witek, Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa, Paulo G Coelho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary stability has been regarded as a key factor to ensure uneventful osseointegration of dental implants. Such stability is often achieved by placing implants in undersized drilled bone. The present study evaluated the effect of drilling dimensions in insertion torque and early implant osseointegration stages in a beagle dog model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six beagle dogs were acquired and subjected to bilateral surgeries in the radii 1 and 3 weeks before death. During surgery, 3 implants, 4 mm in diameter by 10 mm in length, were placed in bone sites drilled to 3.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.8 mm in diameter. The insertion torque was recorded for all samples. After death, the implants in bone were nondecalcified processed and morphologically and morphometrically (bone-to-implant contact and bone area fraction occupancy) evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc test for multiple comparisons at the 95% level of significance.
RESULTS: The insertion torque levels obtained were inversely proportional to the drilling dimension, with a significant difference detected between the 3.2-mm and 3.8-mm groups (P = .003). Despite a significant increase in the bone-to-implant contact over time in vivo for all groups (P = .007), no effect for the drilling dimension was observed. Additionally, no effect of the drilling dimension and time was observed for the bone area fraction occupancy parameter (P = .31). The initial healing pathways differed between implants placed in bone drilled to different dimensions.
CONCLUSIONS: Although different degrees of torque were observed with different drilling dimensions and these resulted in different healing patterns, no differences in the histometrically evaluated parameters were observed.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22182660     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of dental implant insertion torque using a manual ratchet.

Authors:  M M Goswami; Mukul Kumar; Abhinav Vats; A S Bansal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-09-24

2.  Dipyridamole enhances osteogenesis of three-dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bekisz; Roberto L Flores; Lukasz Witek; Christopher D Lopez; Christopher M Runyan; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Effects of osseodensification protocol on insertion, removal torques, and resonance frequency analysis of BioHorizons® conical implants. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Felipe Cáceres; Cristian Troncoso; Ramón Silva; Nelson Pinto
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-31

4.  Bone Tissue Engineering in the Growing Calvaria Using Dipyridamole-Coated, Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds: Construct Optimization and Effects on Cranial Suture Patency.

Authors:  Samantha G Maliha; Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Madison Cox; Alan Meskin; Sejndi Rusi; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.169

5.  Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model.

Authors:  Felipe-Eduardo Baires-Campos; Ryo Jimbo; Estevam-Augusto Bonfante; Maiolino-Thomaz Fonseca-Oliveira; Camila Moura; Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa; Paulo-Guilherme Coelho
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

6.  Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits.

Authors:  Merav Folkman; Alina Becker; Isabelle Meinster; Mahmoud Masri; Zeev Ormianer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Jaime Aramburú; Leticia Pérez-Díaz; Tales Dias do Prado; Berenice Anina Dedavid; Patricia Mazon; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Osseodensification - A novel approach in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Umesh Y Pai; Shobha J Rodrigues; Karishma S Talreja; Mahesh Mundathaje
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

9.  New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep.

Authors:  Paolo Trisi; Marco Berardini; Antonello Falco; Michele Podaliri Vulpiani
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.454

10.  To compare the stability and crestal bone loss of implants placed using osseodensification and traditional drilling protocol: A clinicoradiographical study.

Authors:  Anjum Sultana; Sumit Makkar; Deepesh Saxena; Amit Wadhawan; Chandan Kumar Kusum
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.