Literature DB >> 2218178

Statistical analysis of quality of life data in cancer clinical trials.

M Olschewski1, M Schumacher.   

Abstract

In clinical trials endpoints other than total and/or disease-free survival are gaining more and more interest. In particular, quality of life (QOL) or the well-being of patients has emerged as a synonym for variables describing the subjective reactions of patients towards their disease and its treatment. The statistical analysis of such QOL data is complicated firstly by the large number of variables measured and their obvious lack of objectivity. The construction of suitable aggregate measures allowing a reduction of the measurements into a (preferably) unidimensional index are discussed in the context of an analysis at a fixed time point during the course of treatment. A second problem arises from the consideration that a patient's well-being is subject to changes over time. We discuss the modelling of QOL by suitable stochastic processes which are extensions of a multistate disease process. This allows QOL events to be incorporated into methods of survival analysis by either estimating the relevant transition probabilities between states or calculating quality-adjusted survival times. Finally, some brief guidelines for the planning of clinical trials including QOL measurements will be proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2218178     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780090705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Expressing estimators of expected quality adjusted survival as functions of Nelson-Aalen estimators.

Authors:  Y Huang; T A Louis
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Tests for comparing mark-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ian W McKeague; Yanqing Sun
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 3.  Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life.

Authors:  B L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-08

4.  A cost-benefit analysis of a cardiovascular disease prevention trial, using folate supplementation as an example.

Authors:  J Hornberger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Goodness-of-fit test of the stratified mark-specific proportional hazards model with continuous mark.

Authors:  Yanqing Sun; Mei Li; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group quality of life assessment: design, analysis, and data management issues.

Authors:  C B Scott; J Stetz; D W Bruner; T H Wasserman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Mark-specific additive hazards regression with continuous marks.

Authors:  Dongxiao Han; Liuquan Sun; Yanqing Sun; Li Qi
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS WITH CONTINUOUS MARKS.

Authors:  Yanqing Sun; Peter B Gilbert; Ian W McKeague
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 4.028

9.  Therapy of small breast cancer--four-year results of a prospective non-randomized study. German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG).

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.