Literature DB >> 7920494

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group quality of life assessment: design, analysis, and data management issues.

C B Scott1, J Stetz, D W Bruner, T H Wasserman.   

Abstract

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has embarked on seven phase II or phase III multicentre clinical trials involving a quality of life component. Each quality of life trial used questionnaires or examinations that have been tested for reliability and validity by independent investigators. Each trial includes questionnaires that examine the patient's physical, functional, social, and emotional status, and that measure a specific quality of life issue pertinent to the patient's diagnosis or treatment. Two trial designs have been implemented for studies with quality of life endpoints. One design involves companion trials to the primary treatment study pertaining solely to the quality of life endpoint. The second design integrates the quality of life component into the primary trial design. The RTOG has found a need for education of individuals and institutions expected to administer and obtain the quality of life data. Once the data have been collected several methods for the analysis of the quality of life data are available. However, there is no one best method for analysing quality of life data, thus more than one method should be used in order to provide insight into the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7920494     DOI: 10.1007/bf00435385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

1.  The measurement of change of quality of life in clinical trials.

Authors:  A H Zwinderman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: review and recommendations.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; P Feigl; B Metch; K A Hayden; F L Meyskens; J Crowley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Evaluating quality and quantity of life in breast cancer adjuvant trials.

Authors:  J H Fetting
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Regression with an ordered categorical response.

Authors:  T J Hastie; J L Botha; C M Schnitzler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Tests of significance using regression models for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  S M Snapinn; R D Small
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Measuring and analysing quality of life in cancer clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  P M Fayers; D R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1983 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Quality-of-life assessment: patient compliance with questionnaire completion.

Authors:  A Sadura; J Pater; D Osoba; M Levine; M Palmer; K Bennett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  M A List; C Ritter-Sterr; S B Lansky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Methodologic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors in Mainland China.

Authors:  Yong Wu; Wei-Han Hu; Yun-Fei Xia; Jun Ma; Meng-Zhong Liu; Nian-Ji Cui
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcomes and survivorship in radiation oncology: overcoming the cons.

Authors:  Farzan Siddiqui; Arthur K Liu; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Promise of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Oncology Practice.

Authors:  Muhammad S Beg; Arjun Gupta; Tyler Stewart; Chad D Rethorst
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Outcomes research in cancer clinical trial cooperative groups: the RTOG model.

Authors:  D W Bruner; B Movsas; A Konski; M Roach; M Bondy; C Scarintino; C Scott; W Curran
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.