Literature DB >> 22181016

Bone loss following spinal cord injury in a rat model.

Michael J Voor1, Edward H Brown, Qian Xu, Seid W Waddell, Robert L Burden, Darlene A Burke, David S K Magnuson.   

Abstract

The current study was undertaken to follow the time course of bone loss in the proximal tibia of rats over several weeks following thoracic contusion spinal cord injury (SCI) of varying severity. It was hypothesized that bone loss would be more pronounced in the more severely injured animals, and that hindlimb weight bearing would help prevent bone loss. Twenty-six female Sprague-Dawley rats (200-225 g, 6-7 weeks old) received standard thoracic (T9) injuries at energies of 6.25, 12.5, 25, or 50 g-cm. The rats were scored weekly for hindlimb function during locomotion. At 0, 2 or 3, and 8 weeks, high-resolution micro-CT images of each right tibia were obtained. Mechanical indentation testing was done to measure the compressive strength of the cancellous bone structure. The 6.25 g-cm group showed near normal locomotion, the 12.5 and 25 g-cm groups showed the ability to frequently or occasionally generate weight-supported plantar steps, respectively, and the 50 g-cm group showed only movement without weight-supported plantar stepping. The 6.25, 12.5 and 25 g-cm groups remained at the same level of bone volume fraction (cancBV/TV=0.24±0.07), while the 50 g-cm group experienced severe bone loss (67%), resulting in significantly lower (p<0.05) bone volume fraction (cancBV/TV=0.11±0.05) at 8 weeks. Proximal tibia cancellous bone strength was reduced by approximately 50% in these severely injured rats. Instead of a linear proportionality between injury severity and bone loss, there appears to be a distinct functional threshold, marked by occasional weight-supported stepping, above which bone loss does not occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22181016      PMCID: PMC3353757          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  48 in total

1.  Quantity and quality of trabecular bone in the femur are enhanced by a strongly anabolic, noninvasive mechanical intervention.

Authors:  Clinton Rubin; A Simon Turner; Ralph Müller; Erik Mittra; Kenneth McLeod; Wei Lin; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; C Mallinckrodt; C Jerome; K McLeod; S Bain
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Osteocytes inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption through transforming growth factor-beta: enhancement by estrogen.

Authors:  Terhi J Heino; Teuvo A Hentunen; H Kalervo Väänänen
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; S Bain; C Mallinckrodt; K McLeod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling.

Authors:  L E Lanyon; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Osteoporosis in patients with paralysis after spinal cord injury. A cross sectional study in 46 male patients with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D Sabo; S Blaich; W Wenz; M Hohmann; M Loew; H J Gerner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Immobilization-related bone loss in the rat is increased by calcium deficiency.

Authors:  M Weinreb; G A Rodan; D D Thompson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Regional osteoporosis in women who have a complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  D E Garland; R H Adkins; C A Stewart; R Ashford; D Vigil
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  P Frey-Rindova; E D de Bruin; E Stüssi; M A Dambacher; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and lower extremities years after spinal cord lesion.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; H Bohr; O Schaadt
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1988-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  Mice with sclerostin gene deletion are resistant to the severe sublesional bone loss induced by spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W Qin; W Zhao; X Li; Y Peng; L M Harlow; J Li; Y Qin; J Pan; Y Wu; L Ran; H Z Ke; C P Cardozo; W A Bauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effects of low intensity vibration on bone and muscle in rats with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  H M Bramlett; W D Dietrich; A Marcillo; L J Mawhinney; O Furones-Alonso; A Bregy; Y Peng; Y Wu; J Pan; J Wang; X E Guo; W A Bauman; C Cardozo; W Qin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Locomotor training with adjuvant testosterone preserves cancellous bone and promotes muscle plasticity in male rats after severe spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joshua F Yarrow; Hui Jean Kok; Ean G Phillips; Christine F Conover; Jimmy Lee; Taylor E Bassett; Kinley H Buckley; Michael C Reynolds; Russell D Wnek; Dana M Otzel; Cong Chen; Jessica M Jiron; Zachary A Graham; Christopher Cardozo; Krista Vandenborne; Prodip K Bose; Jose Ignacio Aguirre; Stephen E Borst; Fan Ye
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Bone loss in a new rodent model combining spinal cord injury and cast immobilization.

Authors:  J F Yarrow; F Ye; A Balaez; J M Mantione; D M Otzel; C Chen; L A Beggs; C Baligand; J E Keener; W Lim; R S Vohra; A Batra; S E Borst; P K Bose; F J Thompson; K Vandenborne
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Sclerostin Antibody Reverses the Severe Sublesional Bone Loss in Rats After Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Xiaodong Li; Yuanzhen Peng; Yiwen Qin; Jiangping Pan; Jiliang Li; Aihua Xu; Michael S Ominsky; Christopher Cardozo; Jian Q Feng; Hua Zhu Ke; William A Bauman; Weiping Qin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Testosterone dose dependently prevents bone and muscle loss in rodents after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joshua F Yarrow; Christine F Conover; Luke A Beggs; Darren T Beck; Dana M Otzel; Alexander Balaez; Sarah M Combs; Julie R Miller; Fan Ye; J Ignacio Aguirre; Kathleen G Neuville; Alyssa A Williams; Bryan P Conrad; Chris M Gregory; Thomas J Wronski; Prodip K Bose; Stephen E Borst
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Differential Adaptations of the Musculoskeletal System after Spinal Cord Contusion and Transection in Rats.

Authors:  Ching-Yi Lin; Charlie Androjna; Richard Rozic; Bichtram Nguyen; Brett Parsons; Ronald J Midura; Yu-Shang Lee
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.869

8.  Reactions of the rat musculoskeletal system to compressive spinal cord injury (SCI) and whole body vibration (WBV) therapy.

Authors:  A Schwarz; C Pick; R Harrach; G Stein; H Bendella; O Ozsoy; U Ozsoy; E Schoenau; P Jaminet; L Sarikcioglu; S Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 9.  Occupational Activities: Factors That Tip the Balance From Bone Accrual to Bone Loss.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Steven N Popoff
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.642

10.  Decrease of PPARδ in Type-1-Like Diabetic Rat for Higher Mortality after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Cheng-Chia Tsai; Kung-Shing Lee; Sheng-Hsien Chen; Li-Jen Chen; Keng-Fan Liu; Juei-Tang Cheng
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.