Literature DB >> 10762194

Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

P Frey-Rindova1, E D de Bruin, E Stüssi, M A Dambacher, V Dietz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the loss of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density in radius, ulna and tibia of spinal cord injured persons with different levels of neurologic lesion after 6, 12 and 24 months of spinal cord injury (SCI).
DESIGN: Prospective study in a Paraplegic Centre of the University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (27 males, two females) were examined by the highly precise peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) soon after injury and subsequently at 6, 12 and in some cases 24 months after SCI. Using analysis of the bone mineral density (BMD), various degrees of trabecular and cortical bone loss were recognised. A rehabilitation program was started as soon as possible (1-4 weeks) after SCI. The influence of the level of neurological lesion was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Spasticity was assessed by the Ashworth Scale.
RESULTS: The trabecular bone mineral density of radius and ulna was significantly reduced in subjects with tetraplegia 6 months (radius 19% less, P<0.01; ulna 6% less, P>0.05) and 12 months after SCI (radius 28% less, P<0.01; ulna 15% less, P<0.05). The cortical bone density was significantly reduced 12 months after SCI (radius 3% less, P<0.05; ulna 4% less, P<0.05). No changes in BMD of trabecular or cortical bone of radius and ulna were detected in subjects with paraplegia. The trabecular BMD of tibia was significantly reduced 6 months (5% less, P<0.05) and 12 months after SCI (15% less, P<0.05) in all subjects with SCI. The cortical bone density of the tibia only was decreased after a year following SCI (7% less, P<0.05). No significant difference between both groups, subjects with paraplegia and subjects with tetraplegia was found for tibia cortical or trabecular BMD. There was no significant influence for the physical activity level or the degree of spasticity on bone mineral density in all subjects with SCI.
CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after SCI a significant decrease of BMD was found in trabecular bone in radius and in tibia of subjects with tetraplegia. In subjects paraplegia, a decrease only in tibia BMD occurred. Intensity of physical activity did not significantly influence the loss of BMD in all subjects with para- and tetraplegia. However, in some subjects regular intensive loading exercise activity in early rehabilitation (tilt table, standing) can possibly attenuate the decrease of BMD of tibia. No influence was found for the degree of spasticity on the bone loss in all subjects with SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10762194     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  71 in total

1.  Assessment of anthropometric, systemic, and lifestyle factors influencing bone status in the legs of spinal cord injured individuals.

Authors:  P Eser; A Frotzler; Y Zehnder; H Schiessl; J Denoth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  An evidence-based review of aging of the body systems following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  S L Hitzig; J J Eng; W C Miller; B M Sakakibara
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Association between sclerostin and bone density in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Leslie R Morse; Supreetha Sudhakar; Valery Danilack; Carlos Tun; Antonio Lazzari; David R Gagnon; Eric Garshick; Ricardo A Battaglino
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Bone Imaging and Fracture Risk after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Mechanical and neural changes in plantar-flexor muscles after spinal cord injury in humans.

Authors:  K Yaeshima; D Negishi; S Yamamoto; T Ogata; K Nakazawa; N Kawashima
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Multiple exposures to unloading decrease bone's responsivity but compound skeletal losses in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Surabhi Vijayaraghavan; Gunes Uzer; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Risk factors for the development of osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. A 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  L Gifre; J Vidal; J L Carrasco; A Muxi; E Portell; A Monegal; N Guañabens; P Peris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies.

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Neil McCartney
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

10.  31st g. Heiner sell lectureship: secondary medical consequences of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  William A Bauman; Mark A Korsten; Miroslav Radulovic; Gregory J Schilero; Jill M Wecht; Ann M Spungen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.