Literature DB >> 12115361

Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography.

Douglas S Hawkins1, Joseph G Rajendran, Ernest U Conrad, James D Bruckner, Janet F Eary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a significant prognostic factor for osteosarcoma (OS) and the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT). Conventional radiographic imaging does not discriminate between responding and nonresponding osseous tumors. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive imaging modality that accurately predicts histopathologic response in patients with various malignancies. To describe the FDG PET imaging characteristics and to determine the correlation between FDG PET imaging and chemotherapy response in children with bone sarcomas, we reviewed our single institution experience.
METHODS: Thirty-three pediatric patients with OS or ESFT with osseous primary sites were evaluated by FDG PET. All patients received standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG PET standard uptake values before (SUV1) and after (SUV2) chemotherapy were analyzed and correlated with chemotherapy response assessed by histopathology in surgically excised tumors. Twenty-six patients had SUV1, SUV2, and surgical excision.
RESULTS: Although the mean SUV1 in children with OS or ESFT were similar (8.2. vs. 5.3, P = 0.13), mean SUV2 for OS patients was greater than the values for ESFT patients (3.3 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01). All ESFT patients and 28% of OS patients had a favorable histologic response to chemotherapy (>or= 90% necrosis). Combining ESFT and OS patients, both SUV2 and the ratio of SUV2 to SUV1 (SUV2:SUV1) were correlated with histologic response (P = 0.01 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSION: FDG PET evaluation of pediatric bone sarcomas demonstrated significant alteration in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUV2 and SUV2:SUV1 correlated with histopathologic assessment of response and potentially could be used as a noninvasive surrogate to predict response in patients. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115361     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  63 in total

1.  Has PET become an important clinical tool in paediatric imaging?

Authors:  Klaus Hahn; Thomas Pfluger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prediction of tumour necrosis fractions using metabolic and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT indices, after one course and at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in children and young adults with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Hyung Jun Im; Tae Sung Kim; Seog-Yun Park; Hye Sook Min; June Hyuk Kim; Hyun Guy Kang; Seung Eun Park; Mi Mi Kwon; Jong Hyung Yoon; Hyeon Jin Park; Seok-ki Kim; Byung-Kiu Park
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Assessment of histological response of paediatric bone sarcomas using FDG PET in comparison to morphological volume measurement and standardized MRI parameters.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Patrick Hundsdörfer; Daniel Misch; Ingo G Steffen; Stefan Schönberger; Christian Furth; Michail Plotkin; Juri Ruf; Hubertus Hautzel; Brigitte Stöver; Regine Kluge; Uta Bierbach; Sylke Otto; James F Beck; Christiane Franzius; Günter Henze; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Response to chemotherapy estimates by FDG PET is an important prognostic factor in patients with Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  A Raciborska; K Bilska; K Drabko; E Michalak; R Chaber; M Pogorzała; K Połczyńska; G Sobol; M Wieczorek; K Muszyńska-Rosłan; M Rychlowska-Pruszyńska; C Rodriguez-Galindo; M Dziuk
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  FDG PET/CT imaging of desmoplastic small round cell tumor: findings at staging, during treatment and at follow-up.

Authors:  Austin Ostermeier; M Beth McCarville; Fariba Navid; Scott E Snyder; Barry L Shulkin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27

6.  Is PET/CT necessary in paediatric oncology? For.

Authors:  Christiane Franzius; Kai Uwe Juergens; Otmar Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The role of positron emission tomography in pediatric musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Beth McCarville
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Carbon-11-methionine positron emission tomography imaging of chordoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Katsumi Tamura; Kenji Sagou; Mei Tian; Tetsuya Suhara; Susumu Kandatsu; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Shuji Tanada; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Sarcoma mid-therapy [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and patient outcome.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Ernest U Conrad; Janet O'Sullivan; Douglas S Hawkins; Scott M Schuetze; Finbarr O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults.

Authors:  Douglas S Hawkins; Ernest U Conrad; James E Butrynski; Scott M Schuetze; Janet F Eary
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.