Literature DB >> 22179252

Correlation between quantitative PCR and culture-based methods for measuring Enterococcus spp. over various temporal scales at three California marine beaches.

Reagan R Converse1, John F Griffith, Rachel T Noble, Richard A Haugland, Kenneth C Schiff, Stephen B Weisberg.   

Abstract

Several studies have examined how fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) measurements compare between quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the culture methods it is intended to replace. Here, we extend those studies by examining the stability of that relationship within a beach, as affected by time of day and seasonal variations in source. Enterococcus spp. were quantified at three southern California beaches in the morning and afternoon using two qPCR assays, membrane filtration, and defined-substrate testing. While qPCR and culture-based measurements were consistently and significantly correlated, strength of the correlation varied both among and within beaches. Correlations were higher in the morning (0.45 < ρ < 0.74 [P < 0.002]) than in the afternoon (0.18 < ρ < 0.45 [P < 0.021]) and higher when the fecal contamination was concentrated (0.38 < ρ < 0.83 [P < 0.001]) than when it was diffuse (0.19 < ρ < 0.34 [P < 0.003]). The ratios of culture-based and qPCR results (CFU or most probable number [MPN] per calibrator cell equivalents [CCE]) also varied spatially and temporally. Ratios ranged between 0.04 and 0.85 CFU or MPN per CCE and were lowest at the beach affected by diffuse pollution. Patterns in the ratios over the course of the day were dissimilar across beaches, increasing with time at one beach and decreasing at another. The spatial and temporal variability we observed indicate that the empirical relationship between culture-based and qPCR results is not universal, even within a beach.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22179252      PMCID: PMC3273013          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07136-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

1.  Effect of sampling frequency on shoreline microbiology assessments.

Authors:  M K Leecaster; S B Weisberg
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Tiered approach for identification of a human fecal pollution source at a recreational beach: case study at Avalon Bay, Catalina Island, California.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Jed A Fuhrman; Robert D Mrse; Stanley B Grant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Decadal and shorter period variability of surf zone water quality at Huntington Beach, California.

Authors:  A B Boehm; S B Grant; J H Kim; S L Mowbray; C D McGee; C D Clark; D M Foley; D E Wellman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Haugland; Shawn C Siefring; Larry J Wymer; Kristen P Brenner; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 5.  A review of technologies for rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters.

Authors:  Rachel T Noble; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Effect of sunlight on survival of indicator bacteria in seawater.

Authors:  R S Fujioka; H H Hashimoto; E B Siwak; R H Young
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Quantification of enterococci and human adenoviruses in environmental samples by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jian-Wen He; Sunny Jiang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Inactivation of indicator micro-organisms from various sources of faecal contamination in seawater and freshwater.

Authors:  R T Noble; I M Lee; K C Schiff
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Rapidly measured indicators of recreational water quality are predictive of swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Rebecca L Calderon; Elizabeth Sams; Michael Beach; Kristen P Brenner; Ann H Williams; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Do U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recreational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Nitika Pai; Joseph N S Eisenberg; John M Colford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Advancements in mitigating interference in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for microbial water quality monitoring.

Authors:  Sharon P Nappier; Audrey Ichida; Kirsten Jaglo; Rich Haugland; Kaedra R Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Comparison of the multiple-sample means with composite sample results for fecal indicator bacteria by quantitative PCR and culture.

Authors:  Reagan R Converse; Larry J Wymer; Alfred P Dufour; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Performance and specificity of the covalently linked immunomagnetic separation-ATP method for rapid detection and enumeration of enterococci in coastal environments.

Authors:  Amity G Zimmer-Faust; Vanessa Thulsiraj; Donna Ferguson; Jennifer A Jay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Development and evaluation of a Quadruplex Taq Man real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium and their vanA and vanB genotypes.

Authors:  Taghi Naserpour Farivar; Reza Najafipour; Pouran Johari; Masoumeh Aslanimehr; Amir Peymani; Hoasan Jahani Hashemi; Baman Mirzaui
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2014-10

5.  Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification.

Authors:  Samuel Dorevitch; Abhilasha Shrestha; Stephanie DeFlorio-Barker; Cathy Breitenbach; Ira Heimler
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction.

Authors:  Mark A Renshaw; Brett P Olds; Christopher L Jerde; Margaret M McVeigh; David M Lodge
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 7.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.