Literature DB >> 14962126

Inactivation of indicator micro-organisms from various sources of faecal contamination in seawater and freshwater.

R T Noble1, I M Lee, K C Schiff.   

Abstract

AIM: The survival of indicator micro-organisms in aquatic systems is affected by both biotic and abiotic factors. Much of the past research on this topic has been conducted using laboratory-generated cultures of indicator bacteria. For this study, we used natural sources of faecal contamination as inoculants into environmental water samples, thereby representing the wide diversity of organisms likely to be found in faecal contamination. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Rates of inactivation of water quality indicators, total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli, enterococci (EC) and F+-specific coliphage were studied in three experiments using inoculants of sewage influent, sewage effluent and urban storm drain run-off. Effects of temperature, nutrients, total suspended solids, bacterial load and solar irradiation were studied in fresh and seawater matrices. Results demonstrated that temperature and solar irradiation had significant effects upon rates of inactivation (anova, P < 0.001). Inactivation rates were similar, regardless of the inoculant type. EC degraded the slowest in the dark with T90s of 115-121 and 144-177 h at 20 and 14 degrees C, respectively. When incubated in sunlight, EC was inactivated significantly more rapidly than either E. coli or F+-specific coliphage (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of indicator bacteria is not dependent upon the original source of contamination. Inactivation rates of indicator bacteria were similar in fresh and seawater matrices. However, EC degraded more rapidly in sunlight than E. coli. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study suggests that the source of faecal contamination is not an important factor to inactivation rates of indicator bacteria. However, rates of inactivation of indicator bacteria are likely system specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14962126     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  29 in total

1.  Correlation between quantitative PCR and culture-based methods for measuring Enterococcus spp. over various temporal scales at three California marine beaches.

Authors:  Reagan R Converse; John F Griffith; Rachel T Noble; Richard A Haugland; Kenneth C Schiff; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Hydrometeorological variables predict fecal indicator bacteria densities in freshwater: data-driven methods for variable selection.

Authors:  Rachael M Jones; Li Liu; Samuel Dorevitch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Test of direct and indirect effects of agrochemicals on the survival of fecal indicator bacteria.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Jason R Rohr; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.

Authors:  Michèle Gourmelon; Marie Paule Caprais; Raphaël Ségura; Cécile Le Mennec; Solen Lozach; Jean Yves Piriou; Alain Rincé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Stratification and loading of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in a tidally muted urban salt marsh.

Authors:  Karina K Johnston; John H Dorsey; Jose A Saez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) in waters of the Lower Ballona Creek Watershed, Los Angeles County, California.

Authors:  Stephanie Kawecki; Gary Kuleck; John H Dorsey; Christopher Leary; Michelle Lum
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 7.  Survival strategies of Escherichia coli and Vibrio spp.: contribution of the viable but nonculturable phenotype to their stress-resistance and persistence in adverse environments.

Authors:  M Orruño; V R Kaberdin; I Arana
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Lack of direct effects of agrochemicals on zoonotic pathogens and fecal indicator bacteria.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Jacob K Senkbeil; Jason R Rohr; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Differential decay of enterococci and Escherichia coli originating from two fecal pollution sources.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.