Literature DB >> 24332649

Quality of physician-patient relationships is associated with the influence of physician treatment recommendations among patients with prostate cancer who chose active surveillance.

Heather Orom1, D Lynn Homish2, Gregory G Homish2, Willie Underwood3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With growing evidence that some men with prostate cancer (PCa) may be overtreated, clinicians need greater knowledge of the factors that influence uptake of treatment recommendations in general, and specifically, uptake of active surveillance in patients for whom this is an appropriate treatment option. The objective of this study was to test the role of the quality of the physician-patient relationship in the choice to be followed by active surveillance, rather than receive definitive therapy (e.g., surgery and radiation). We hypothesized that patients would have been more influenced by their physicians' treatment recommendations to the degree that they held more positive perceptions of their relationship with their physicians, independent of treatment recommended. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with PCa (n = 120) being followed with active surveillance at a comprehensive cancer center completed self-report assessments of their treatment decision-making process. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the association between participants' perceptions of their relationships with their physicians and influence of these physicians' recommendations on their treatment decision.
RESULTS: After controlling for the type of treatment recommended, Gleason score, and education, 3 predictors, trust in the physician, perceived closeness with the physician, and the degree to which the physician shared control over treatment decision making, were associated with greater influence of physician's treatment recommendation. Receiving a recommendation for active surveillance, compared with definitive therapy, was also associated with higher perceived trust, closeness, shared control over treatment decision making, lower likelihood of having been treated poorly by a physician, and greater influence of physician's treatment recommendation.
CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing concern that patients with relatively less aggressive PCa, older age, or serious comorbidities are being unnecessarily treated with surgery or radiation, putting them at risk for side effects, and contributing to high health care costs. When active surveillance is an appropriate course of treatment, the quality of patients' relationships with their physicians may be a determinant of following a recommendation for active surveillance. Results may have implications for treatment uptake in general, indicating that the quality of the physician-patient relationship, including trust, closeness, shared decision making--all elements of patient-centered care--may be important motivators of treatment adoption and adherence.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; patient compliance; physician-patient relations; prostate neoplasms; trust; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24332649      PMCID: PMC4004652          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  27 in total

1.  Application of negative binomial modeling for discrete outcomes: a case study in aging research.

Authors:  Amy L Byers; Heather Allore; Thomas M Gill; Peter N Peduzzi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Improved biomarkers for prostate cancer: a definite need.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; William B Isaacs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and satisfaction with health care.

Authors:  Mark G Haviland; Leo S Morales; Thomas H Dial; Harold Alan Pincus
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.

Authors:  W Gardner; E P Mulvey; E C Shaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Regression analysis for correlated data.

Authors:  K Y Liang; S L Zeger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Patient trust: is it related to patient-centered behavior of primary care physicians?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Introduction of information during the initial medical visit: consequences for patient follow-through with physician recommendations for medication.

Authors:  K Rost; W Carter; T Inui
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; B Gandek; S Greenfield; W Rogers; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust.

Authors:  A C Kao; D C Green; A M Zaslavsky; J P Koplan; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patient characteristics and experiences associated with trust in specialist physicians.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Tejal K Gandhi; E John Orav; David W Bates; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-10
View more
  12 in total

1.  Relationships as Medicine: Quality of the Physician-Patient Relationship Determines Physician Influence on Treatment Recommendation Adherence.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Willie Underwood; Zinan Cheng; D Lynn Homish; I'Yanna Scott
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tania Lobo; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpeter; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Kathryn Taylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?

Authors:  Arun Mallapareddi; Julie Ruterbusch; Elyse Reamer; Susan Eggly; Jinping Xu
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Prostate cancer management choices in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Jennifer B Gordetsky; Benjamin Saylor; Sejong Bae; Jeffrey W Nix; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 6.  Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review.

Authors:  Claire Kim; Frances C Wright; Nicole J Look Hong; Gary Groot; Lucy Helyer; Pamela Meiers; May Lynn Quan; Robin Urquhart; Rebecca Warburton; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Renzi; Chiara Fioretti; Serena Oliveri; Ketti Mazzocco; Dario Zerini; Ombretta Alessandro; Damaris P Rojas; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-26

8.  What Do Primary Healthcare Providers and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners in Palestine Need to Know about Exercise for Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Consensual Study Using the Delphi Technique.

Authors:  Ramzi Shawahna; Mahmoud Al-Atrash
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Canadian Men's perspectives about active surveillance in prostate cancer: need for guidance and resources.

Authors:  Margaret Fitch; Kittie Pang; Veronique Ouellet; Carmen Loiselle; Shabbir Alibhai; Simone Chevalier; Darrel E Drachenberg; Antonio Finelli; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Simon Sutcliffe; Alan So; Simon Tanguay; Fred Saad; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Systematic review of shared decision-making in surgery.

Authors:  S M L de Mik; F E Stubenrouch; R Balm; D T Ubbink
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.