Literature DB >> 22177174

A new quadratic sling for male stress incontinence: retrograde leak point pressure as a measure of urethral resistance.

Craig V Comiter1, Victor Nitti, Christopher Elliot, Eugene Rhee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objective methods are essential for evaluating post-prostatectomy incontinence. While symptom score and pad weight may be the most useful methods to evaluate preoperative vs postoperative continence, neither is useful for guiding intraoperative sling tension. The Virtue quadratic sling (Coloplast, Humlebaek, Denmark) is a new device for treating post-prostatectomy incontinence that combines a transobturator and prepubic surgical approach. We examined urethral resistance by measuring retrograde leak point pressure during key portions of the surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 consecutive men who elected to undergo Virtue sling surgery were evaluated with retrograde leak point pressure before and during the surgery. Retrograde leak point pressure was measured via perfusion sphincterometry at baseline, after transobturator tensioning, after prepubic tensioning, and after transobturator and prepubic arms were secured in place.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 70 years. Mean baseline retrograde leak point pressure was 33.4 ± 8.8 cm water. After transobturator tensioning, mean retrograde leak point pressure increased to 43.3 ± 6.8 cm water. After prepubic tensioning mean retrograde leak point pressure was 55.8 ± 8.7, and final retrograde leak point pressure after transobturator and prepubic fixation increased to 68.8 ± 6.0 cm water. Each mean retrograde leak point pressure value was significantly higher than the preceding value.
CONCLUSIONS: The Virtue sling provides ventral urethral elevation using a transobturator approach, and a long segment of urethral compression against the genitourinary diaphragm via a straightforward prepubic technique without the risks of bone screws or retropubic needle passage. Transobturator and prepubic components of the quadratic fixation contributed to increasing urethral resistance as measured by intraoperative retrograde leak point pressure. This quadratic technique has a potentially greater ability to provide urethral compression than does a purely perineal or transobturator sling.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177174     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R Jarvis; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Anything new in its management?

Authors:  Romain Caremel; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  New findings in benign prostatic hyperplasia and incontinence: highlights from the 26th annual congress of the European association of urology, march 18-22, 2011, vienna, austria.

Authors:  Roman Herout; Alex Farr; Sabina Sevcenco; Amir Kazzazi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Simultaneous penile prosthesis and male sling/artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Dominic Lee; Claudio Romero; Frances Alba; O Lenaine Westney; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Authors:  Craig Comiter
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Retrograde leak point pressure measurement improves outcomes of the Virtue male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Michael W Sourial; Patrick O Richard; Julie Morisset; Mazen Jundi; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-08

Review 9.  The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

Authors:  Craig V Comiter; Amy D Dobberfuhl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 10.  Contemporary surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a review of technological advances in current continence surgery.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.