Literature DB >> 22177169

Nomograms to predict patency after microsurgical vasectomy reversal.

Wayland Hsiao1, Marc Goldstein, James S Rosoff, Annalisa Piccorelli, Michael W Kattan, Eleni A Greenwood, John P Mulhall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: After undergoing vasectomy up to 6% of men will elect to undergo vasectomy reversal. For these men paternity can be achieved with vasectomy reversal or surgical sperm retrieval coupled with assisted reproduction. Nevertheless, it remains difficult for surgeons to accurately counsel men on the chance of patency after vasectomy reversal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 548 patients who underwent microsurgical vasectomy reversal. Surgery was considered successful if sperm concentration was 100,000 or more sperm per ml, total count was 100,000 or more sperm per ejaculate, motile sperm were present and there was no evidence of subsequent failure. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to calculate the probability of having a successful vasectomy reversal and nomograms for patency were generated from this model.
RESULTS: A total of 548 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Mean followup was 1.8 ± 0.10 years. Mean patient age was 43.4 ± 0.3 years and mean duration of obstruction was 10.4 ± 0.2 years. Two nomograms to predict patency were generated, one for preoperative counseling and a second for postoperative counseling. The factors with the largest effect on patency were average testicular volume and obstruction duration. The factor with the least effect was the presence of sperm granuloma. The concordance index for the preoperative and the postoperative nomograms was 0.64 and 0.66, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this represents the first use of nomograms to predict the likelihood of patency after microsurgical vasectomy reversal. These nomograms may prove useful to guide further treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177169     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Lindsey Herrel; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Parviz K Kavoussi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Efficacy of Intraoperative Mitomycin-C in Vasovasostomy Procedure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Farzad Allameh; Jalil Hosseini; Hamidreza Qashqai; Hamzeh Mazaherylaghab
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-07-14

Review 7.  Review of Azoospermia.

Authors:  Matthew Wosnitzer; Marc Goldstein; Matthew P Hardy
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2014-03-31

8.  The need for epididymovasostomy at vasectomy reversal plateaus in older vasectomies: a study of 1229 cases.

Authors:  P Mui; A Perkins; P J Burrows; S F Marks; P J Turek
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 9.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.