Literature DB >> 22175056

Timing and frequency of bowel activity in patients ingesting sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate and adjuvant bisacodyl for colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Stephen Vanner1, Lawrence C Hookey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the wealth of research investigating bowel cleansing efficacy, there are very little data on the timing or frequency of bowel movements after each agent is ingested.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of each component of a three-day combined sodium picosulphatemagnesium citrate (PSLX) and bisacodyl regimen on the timing and frequency of bowel activity in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
METHODS: Outpatients booked for colonoscopy were asked to complete a diary of their bowel preparation that tracked the timing of bowel movements. Bowel preparation quality was assessed using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale. Bowel activity was compared with baseline and correlated with colon cleansing. Subgroup analysis was performed examining the effect of timing of the procedure and split-dose regimens.
RESULTS: One hundred patients undergoing colon cleansing received bisacodyl 10 mg at 17:00 three days and two days before the day of colonoscopy. In one group, both sachets of PSLX were given the night before colonoscopy, while the second group, whose colonoscopies were scheduled after 11:00, ingested one sachet the night before and the second sachet at 06:00 on the day of colonoscopy. Patients had a mean of 1.7 bowel movements per day in the seven days before starting the cleansing regimen. Both doses of bisacodyl tablets resulted in a significant increase in the mean number of bowel movements compared with baseline (3.3⁄day first dose; 3.8⁄day second dose [P=0.03 and 0.001, respectively]). Each dose of PSLX also resulted in a significant increase in bowel movement frequency compared with baseline, with means of 4.4, 6.3 and 4.5 bowel movements after each dose. The mean time to the final bowel movement following the second sachet of PSLX was 8.9 h when taken the night before, and 3.9 h when taken the morning of the procedure. Bowel preparation quality significantly correlated with bowel frequency when total bowel movements were considered and when only the effects of bisacodyl were accounted for (P<0.01 for each). DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate that the addition of bisacodyl before PSLX ingestion has a significant additive effect on bowel frequency and correlates with bowel cleansing quality. The timing of the resulting bowel movements have practical implications for sleep and travel times to endoscopy suites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22175056      PMCID: PMC3266157          DOI: 10.1155/2011/950263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  14 in total

Review 1.  Colon cleansing before colonoscopy: does oral sodium phosphate solution still make sense?

Authors:  D K Rex; S J Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity.

Authors:  T B Linden; J D Waye
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alaa Rostom; Emilie Jolicoeur; Catherine Dubé; Sylvie Grégoire; Dilip Patel; Navaaz Saloojee; Catherine Lowe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; David Nicolas-Perez; Antonio Gimeno-Garcia; Begona Grosso; Alejandro Jimenez; Juan Ortega; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms--a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial.

Authors:  Han-Mo Chiu; Jaw-Town Lin; Hsiu-Po Wang; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Amer M A El Sayed; Zeina A Kanafani; Fadi H Mourad; Assaad M Soweid; Kassem A Barada; Clarisse S Adorian; Walid A Nasreddine; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing.

Authors:  Jack A DiPalma; Bruce G Wolff; Alan Meagher; Mark vB Cleveland
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy--timing is the key!

Authors:  J M Church
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; William T Depew; Stephen J Vanner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality.

Authors:  Alaa Rostom; Emilie Jolicoeur
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  7 in total

1.  Seeking the ultimate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: is the end in sight?

Authors:  Robert Jay Hilsden
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  A delayed onset of bowel activity after the start of conventional polyethylene glycol predicts inadequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Vasilios Papastergiou; Stelios Papasavvas; Nicoletta Mathou; Athanasios Giannakopoulos; Aikaterini Evgenidi; John A Karagiannis; Konstantina D Paraskeva
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Nicholas Horton; Ari Garber; Henrietta Hasson; Rocio Lopez; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  More Is Not Always Better: A Randomized Trial Of Low Volume Oral Laxative, Enemas, And Combination Of Both Demonstrate That Enemas Alone Are Most Efficacious For Preparation For Flexible Sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Samson Haimanot; Katherine Marchut; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 5.  Systematic Review: Outcomes by Duration of NPO Status prior to Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Ashish Malhotra; Nancy Greer; Roderick MacDonald; Joseph Wels; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Assessing Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Changing Our Focus to What Really Matters.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-09

7.  Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials.

Authors:  Chang Nancy Wang; Ruobing Yang; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.