Literature DB >> 9788383

Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy--timing is the key!

J M Church1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Polyethylene glycol gut lavage is an effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The quality of the preparation is not uniform however, and most studies report a rate of suboptimal cleansing of 10 percent or more. One of the possible reasons for a poor preparation is the length of time between the lavage and the examination. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of timing of polyethylene glycol gut lavage on the quality of the preparation achieved.
METHODS: Patients referred for elective outpatient colonoscopy with afternoon appointments were randomized to take polyethylene glycol gut lavage either the same morning as their examination (Group 1) or the afternoon of the day before (Group 2). The colonoscopist was unaware of the preparation timing until after the examination was over. During the examination the endoscopist scored the quality of bowel preparation in the cecum, ascending colon, and transverse and left colon. Patient demographics and clinical data were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 157 patients in Group 1 (colonoscopy complete in 152 patients) and 160 in Group 2 (colonoscopy complete in 159 patients). The groups were similar in age and gender, indication for colonoscopy, and previous colonic surgery. Patients who drank gut lavage on the morning of their colonoscopy had a greatly better preparation in all areas of the colon than the patients who took their preparation the night before. In the cecum, 97 Group 1 patients had an excellent preparation (vs. 14 Group 2 patients), 45 had a good preparation (vs. 103 Group 2 patients), and 10 had a fair preparation (vs. 33 Group 2 patients). In the ascending colon, numbers of patients with excellent, good, fair, and poor results were 103, 45, 5, and 0 for Group 1 and 12, 107, 32, and 7 for Group 2. Results in the transverse and left colons were 102, 50, 5, 0 and 93, 55, 7, 2 for Group 1 and 15, 116, 27, 5 and 18, 114, 24, 3 for Group 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The timing of administration of polyethylene glycol-based gut lavage is a major determinant of the quality of the bowel preparation achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9788383     DOI: 10.1007/bf02258217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  37 in total

1.  Improving the quality of bowel preparation: one step closer to the holy grail?

Authors:  Edward W Holt; Michael S Verhille
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative study of two bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution.

Authors:  Savit Kositchaiwat; Weerapat Suwanthanmma; Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul; Vaewvadee Tiewthanom; Prisna Rerkpatanakit; Chaowalitr Tinkornrusmee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  David E Beck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 5.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing.

Authors:  Chang Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han; Yil Sik Hyun; Joong Ho Bae; Hye Sun Park; Tae Yeob Kim; Yong Cheol Jeon; Joo Hyun Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Willingness to undergo split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and compliance with split-dose instructions.

Authors:  R Zackary Unger; Sable P Amstutz; Da Hea Seo; Melanie Huffman; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Miguel Muñoz-Navas; José Luis Calleja; Guillermo Payeras; Antonio José Hervás; Luis Esteban Abreu; Víctor Orive; Pedro L Menchén; José María Bordas; José Ramón Armengol; Cristina Carretero; Vicente Pons Beltrán; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; Román Manteca; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Fernando Carballo; Juan Manuel Herrerías; Carlos Badiola
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Elyse R Johnston; Dyanna L Gregory; Jody D Ciolino; Andrew Cooper; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.