Literature DB >> 14572566

Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing.

Jack A DiPalma1, Bruce G Wolff, Alan Meagher, Mark vB Cleveland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an attempt to improve patient tolerance for colonoscopy cleansing, a reduced volume lavage regimen with 2 L sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS, NuLYTELY, Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, MA) plus 20 mg p.o. bisacodyl (Half Lytely, Braintree Laboratories) was compared with standard 4 L SF-ELS lavage for safety and efficacy.
METHODS: At two centers, 200 patients undergoing colonoscopy for routine indications were randomized to receive the reduced volume or standard 4 L method. The day before scheduled colonoscopy, study subjects were allowed a normal breakfast and clear liquids for lunch and dinner. Those randomized to receive the reduced volume method received four 5-mg bisacodyl tablets p.o. at noon. Six hours later, they received 2 L SF-ELS given as 10 oz every 10 min. Subjects randomized to receive 4 L SF-ELS also drank their solution at 6:00 PM in a similar fashion. Colonoscopists, unaware as to the randomized preparation received, rated efficacy of cleansing. Patient tolerance and various hematological and biochemical parameters were assessed.
RESULTS: Physician assessment of colon cleansing showed no differences between those patients randomized to receive reduced volume (n = 93) or 4 L (n = 93) SF-ELS cleansing (p = 0.16). There was a profound reduction in preparation side effects. The reduced volume preparation had less fullness (p < 0.01), nausea (p < 0.01), vomiting (p = 0.01), and overall discomfort (p < 0.01). There were no clinically significant changes in hematology or blood chemistry associated with either preparation.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced volume preparation with 2 L SF-ELS and bisacodyl is safe and effective. Clinical symptoms from the reduced volume preparation are significantly reduced compared with traditional 4 L gut lavage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572566     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07690.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  46 in total

1.  National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.

Authors:  Amy K Hara; Mark D Kuo; Meridith Blevins; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Judy Yee; Abraham Dachman; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Update on preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen W Landreneau; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-10

Review 3.  Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sanghoon Park; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Bisacodyl plus split 2-L polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone improves quality of bowel preparation before screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Flavio Valiante; Angelo Bellumat; Manuela De Bona; Michele De Boni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Predictors of lower endoscopy use among patients at three inner-city neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  Richard K Zimmerman; Melissa Tabbarah; Jeanette Trauth; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  A life threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation.

Authors:  Y Mun Woo; Susan Crail; Graham Curry; Colin C Geddes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-16

9.  Same-day 2-L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl vs split 4-L PEG: Bowel cleansing for late-morning colonoscopy.

Authors:  Annalisa de Leone; Darina Tamayo; Giancarla Fiori; Davide Ravizza; Cristina Trovato; Giuseppe De Roberto; Linda Fazzini; Marco Dal Fante; Cristiano Crosta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-16

10.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.