Literature DB >> 15627581

Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.

Jed A Meltzer1, R Todd Constable.   

Abstract

Contemporary theories of hippocampal function suggest that both encoding and retrieval of episodic memories may be accomplished by neural circuitry embedded within the same anatomical structures, but neuroimaging support for this hypothesis has been ambiguous. Recent studies suggest that the best available indicators of hippocampal encoding and retrieval operations are selective activations due to novelty, encoding success, and recall success in a paired associate learning paradigm. In the current study, both encoding and cued recall of paired associate words were conducted during a single session of fMRI scanning. Bilateral activation in the medial temporal lobe was detected for encoding word pairs vs. a fixation baseline and for encoding novel word pairs vs. repeated word pairs. These activations were stronger in subjects who successfully memorized more word pairs. In cued recall, greater responses were seen in higher performing subjects. In lower performing subjects, responses were greater to cue words whose paired associate was correctly recalled than to cue words whose correct associate had been forgotten (or not encoded). The difference between correct and incorrect trials was more pronounced on repeated presentations of the same cue words, but not apparent on their first presentation alone. Overlap of encoding and retrieval effects was maximal in the middle of the longitudinal extent of the right hippocampus, with one additional locus of overlap outside the MTL, in left occipitotemporal cortex. The conjunction of these effects suggests that it is correct to view both encoding and recall of associative memories as functions of an integrated hippocampal system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15627581     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Authors:  Jinah Yoon; Yeran Seo; Jangjin Kim; Inah Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Hippocampal activation during face-name associative memory encoding: blocked versus permuted design.

Authors:  Frederick De Vogelaere; Patrick Santens; Erik Achten; Paul Boon; Guy Vingerhoets
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Associative retrieval processes in the human medial temporal lobe: hippocampal retrieval success and CA1 mismatch detection.

Authors:  Janice Chen; Rosanna K Olsen; Alison R Preston; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient-processing theory.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face-name associations: the rewarding power of a smile.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Transverse patterning dissociates human EEG theta power and hippocampal BOLD activation.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Greg A Fonzo; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Age-related cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys mirror human deficits on an automated test battery.

Authors:  Alan H Nagahara; Tim Bernot; Mark H Tuszynski
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.