INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of paclitaxel and bevacizumab on the therapeutic efficacy of (90)Y-labeled B3 monoclonal antibody, directed against Le(y) antigen, for the treatment of Le(y)-positive A431 tumors implanted subcutaneously in the right hind flank of nude mice. METHODS: When the tumor size reached ~200 mm(3), the mice received a single dose of intravenous (iv) (90)Y-labeled B3 (60 μCi/150 μg or 100 μCi/150 μg B3), intraperitoneal paclitaxel (40 mg/kg) or iv bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) for monotherapy. To investigate the effect of combined therapies on survival, the mice were treated with two or three agents in the following combinations: (90)Y-B3 on day 0 and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab on -1 day and (90)Y-B3 on day 0; bevacizumab on -1 day and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab, (90)Y-B3 and paclitaxel each at 1-day intervals. The mice with no treatment were used as a control. The tumor volume at 1000 mm(3) was used as a surrogate end point of survival. RESULTS: Compared to control animals, paclitaxel delayed tumor growth with a significantly longer median survival time (P<.001), whereas bevacizumab alone showed a less pronounced effect on a median survival time (P=.18). (90)Y-B3 increased the median survival time in a dose-dependent manner (P<.05). The combined therapy of bevacizumab with paclitaxel produced a trend toward an increase of the median survival time compared to paclitaxel alone (P=.06), whereas bevacizumab combined with (90)Y-B3 showed a statistically insignificant increase in the median survival time compared to (90)Y-B3 alone (P=.25). The tumor sizes of all animals in these groups reached the surrogate end point of survival by day 35. In contrast, the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel showed a striking synergistic effect in shrinking tumors and prolonging the survival time (P<.001); on day 120, three of nine mice (33%) and six of six mice (100%) were alive without tumor when treated with 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 and 100 μCi (90)Y-B3, respectively. The addition of bevacizumab treatment 1 day before the combined therapy of 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel did not produce a statistically significant increase in survival when compared to the (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel (P>.10). Fluorescence microscopy analysis indicated that paclitaxel increased, whereas bevacizumab decreased, the accumulation and penetration of Alexa Fluor 647-B3 into tumor microenvironment compared to the control (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings on the paclitaxel effect support a hypothesis that the increased tumor accumulation and penetration of (90)Y-B3 as well as the high radiosensitization of tumor cells by paclitaxel may be the major factors responsible for the synergistic effect of the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel. Published by Elsevier Inc.
INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of paclitaxel and bevacizumab on the therapeutic efficacy of (90)Y-labeled B3 monoclonal antibody, directed against Le(y) antigen, for the treatment of Le(y)-positive A431tumors implanted subcutaneously in the right hind flank of nude mice. METHODS: When the tumor size reached ~200 mm(3), the mice received a single dose of intravenous (iv) (90)Y-labeled B3 (60 μCi/150 μg or 100 μCi/150 μg B3), intraperitoneal paclitaxel (40 mg/kg) or iv bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) for monotherapy. To investigate the effect of combined therapies on survival, the mice were treated with two or three agents in the following combinations: (90)Y-B3 on day 0 and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab on -1 day and (90)Y-B3 on day 0; bevacizumab on -1 day and paclitaxel on day 1; bevacizumab, (90)Y-B3 and paclitaxel each at 1-day intervals. The mice with no treatment were used as a control. The tumor volume at 1000 mm(3) was used as a surrogate end point of survival. RESULTS: Compared to control animals, paclitaxel delayed tumor growth with a significantly longer median survival time (P<.001), whereas bevacizumab alone showed a less pronounced effect on a median survival time (P=.18). (90)Y-B3 increased the median survival time in a dose-dependent manner (P<.05). The combined therapy of bevacizumab with paclitaxel produced a trend toward an increase of the median survival time compared to paclitaxel alone (P=.06), whereas bevacizumab combined with (90)Y-B3 showed a statistically insignificant increase in the median survival time compared to (90)Y-B3 alone (P=.25). The tumor sizes of all animals in these groups reached the surrogate end point of survival by day 35. In contrast, the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel showed a striking synergistic effect in shrinking tumors and prolonging the survival time (P<.001); on day 120, three of nine mice (33%) and six of six mice (100%) were alive without tumor when treated with 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 and 100 μCi (90)Y-B3, respectively. The addition of bevacizumab treatment 1 day before the combined therapy of 60 μCi (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel did not produce a statistically significant increase in survival when compared to the (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel (P>.10). Fluorescence microscopy analysis indicated that paclitaxel increased, whereas bevacizumab decreased, the accumulation and penetration of Alexa Fluor 647-B3 into tumor microenvironment compared to the control (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings on the paclitaxel effect support a hypothesis that the increased tumor accumulation and penetration of (90)Y-B3 as well as the high radiosensitization of tumor cells by paclitaxel may be the major factors responsible for the synergistic effect of the combined therapy involving (90)Y-B3 with paclitaxel. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: S J DeNardo; D L Kukis; L A Kroger; R T O'Donnell; K R Lamborn; L A Miers; D G DeNardo; C F Meares; G L DeNardo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-04-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L H Pai-Scherf; J A Carrasquillo; C Paik; O Gansow; M Whatley; D Pearson; K Webber; M Hamilton; C Allegra; M Brechbiel; M C Willingham; I Pastan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas E Witzig; Leo I Gordon; Fernando Cabanillas; Myron S Czuczman; Christos Emmanouilides; Robin Joyce; Brad L Pohlman; Nancy L Bartlett; Gregory A Wiseman; Norman Padre; Antonio J Grillo-López; Pratik Multani; Christine A White Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Manuel J Koppe; Robert P Bleichrodt; Annemieke C Soede; Albert A Verhofstad; David M Goldenberg; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: T Mulligan; J A Carrasquillo; Y Chung; D E Milenic; J Schlom; I Feuerstein; C Paik; P Perentesis; J Reynolds; G Curt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: T A Waldmann; J D White; J A Carrasquillo; J C Reynolds; C H Paik; O A Gansow; M W Brechbiel; E S Jaffe; T A Fleisher; C K Goldman; L E Top; R Bamford; E Zaknoen; E Roessler; C Kasten-Sportes; R England; H Litou; J A Johnson; T Jackson-White; A Manns; B Hanchard; R P Junghans; D L Nelson Journal: Blood Date: 1995-12-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Eun-Ho Kim; Hae Young Ko; A Ram Yu; Hyeongi Kim; Javeria Zaheer; Hyun Ji Kang; Young-Cheol Lim; Kyung Deuk Cho; Hyun-Yoo Joo; Min Kyoung Kang; Jae Jun Lee; Seung-Sook Lee; Hye Jin Kang; Sang Moo Lim; Jin Su Kim Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 6.639