| Literature DB >> 32403237 |
Eun-Ho Kim1,2, Hae Young Ko3,4, A Ram Yu5, Hyeongi Kim3, Javeria Zaheer3,6, Hyun Ji Kang3,6, Young-Cheol Lim3, Kyung Deuk Cho3, Hyun-Yoo Joo1, Min Kyoung Kang5, Jae Jun Lee5, Seung-Sook Lee7, Hye Jin Kang8, Sang Moo Lim3,9, Jin Su Kim3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) serves as a targeted therapy for pan> class="Disease">non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Although HIF(Hypoxia-inducible factors)-1α is an important biomarker during radiation therapy, its role in NHL is unclear. Atorvastatin (ATV) is used as a combination drug for chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: 131I; HIF-1α; RIT; VEGF; atorvastatin; lymphoma; radioimmunotherapy; rituximab
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403237 PMCID: PMC7281655 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Atorvastatin (ATV) improved therapeutic effect of 131I-RTX in Raji cells. (a) Public RNAseq database, Expression ATLAS (EMBL-EBI, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa). Expression ATLAS provided several immortalized B cell lines Project 6 of Open Targets—Epigenomes of Cell Lines. (b) RNAseq of 934 human cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. (c, d) The apoptosis rate and cell viability were assessed by FACS analysis and trypan blue assay after atorvastatin (ATV) or ATV+ rituximab (RTX) treatment. (e) Apoptosis was confirmed by western blotting of cleaved PARP. Raji cell lysates are shown with the corresponding antibodies. (f) Fluorescence image of Alexa488- rituximab (RTX) was acquired using an In Cell Analyzer on a whole tumor tissue. Representative images of tumor tissue after treatment with Alexa488-RTX alone and combination with Alexa488-RTX and atorvastatin (ATV). Alexa488-rituximab (green), TUNEL-positive cell (yellow), and DAPI staining (blue). The lower row is an enlarged image of the white box in the upper row. (g) The accumulation of Alexa-488-RTX per tumor tissue area with or without ATV was quantified with TUNEL-positive cells per tumor tissue area, and the vascular density of RTX with or without ATV was quantified (*p < 0.05). (h) Tumor volume changes were measured in mice treated with PBS, 131I-RTX, ATV, and ATV plus 131I-RTX. The tumor volumes were calculated every other day for 20 days. (**p < 0.005). (i) Survival rates of each group.
Figure 2In vivo images of 131I-RTX after ATV treatment in Raji lymphoma tumor tissue (a) Representative SPECT/CT images of Raji-xenografted mice were acquired at 2, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection of 131I-RTX (upper row) and ATV plus 131I-RTX (lower row). White dotted circles indicate the tumor region. (b) The quantification of 131I-RTX accumulation in tumors is represented by the tumor to blood ratio at each time point (*p < 0.05). The data are the mean ± SD from five independent mice. (c) Autoradiography of 131I-RTX in Raji tumors was conducted after the acquisition of SPECT images (upper row). (d) The total accumulation of 131I-RTX per tumor tissue (**p < 0.005). The data are the mean ± SD from ten independent images. (e) IVIS images presented a lower signal for combination group of ATV plus 131I-RTX (lower row) than the 131I-RTX alone group (upper row) in Raji-luciferase cell xenografted orthotropic model. (f) Total number of photons per second was 1.42 × 107 for 131I-RTX and 3.84 × 107 for 131I-RTX + ATV (p* < 0.05). (g) The result of effective dose for 131I-RTX and 131I-RTX+ ATV.
Estimated absorbed doses (mSv/MBq).
| Target Organ | PBS | Atorvastatin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | *SD | Mean | SD | |
| Adrenals | 6.35.E-02 | 2.84.E-03 | 5.98.E-02 | 1.88.E-03 |
| Brain | 3.56.E-03 | 3.26.E-04 | 3.32.E-03 | 2.91.E-04 |
| Breasts | 2.73.E-02 | 8.23.E-04 | 2.57.E-02 | 4.44.E-04 |
| Gallbladder Wall | 5.97.E-02 | 2.04.E-03 | 5.79.E-02 | 1.79.E-03 |
| LLI Wall | 3.90.E-02 | 1.08.E-02 | 4.62.E-02 | 8.12.E-03 |
| Small Intestine | 2.31.E-01 | 2.17.E-02 | 2.86.E-01 | 4.95.E-02 |
| Stomach Wall | 4.80.E-01 | 1.51.E-01 | 4.14.E-01 | 2.85.E-02 |
| ULI Wall | 4.79.E-02 | 4.70.E-03 | 5.32.E-02 | 2.62.E-03 |
| Heart Wall | 7.93.E-01 | 2.54.E-02 | 7.27.E-01 | 2.54.E-02 |
| Kidneys | 7.92.E-01 | 6.14.E-02 | 7.79.E-01 | 7.14.E-02 |
| Liver | 3.03.E-01 | 1.06.E-02 | 2.79.E-01 | 9.61.E-03 |
| Lungs | 3.41.E-01 | 4.11.E-02 | 3.49.E-01 | 9.45.E-03 |
| Muscle | 3.03.E-02 | 2.91.E-03 | 3.09.E-02 | 1.26.E-03 |
| Ovaries | 4.26.E-02 | 1.04.E-02 | 5.06.E-02 | 6.30.E-03 |
| Pancreas | 8.04.E-02 | 8.80.E-03 | 7.32.E-02 | 1.42.E-03 |
| Red Marrow | 2.82.E-02 | 2.01.E-03 | 2.84.E-02 | 5.22.E-04 |
| Osteogenic Cells | 4.64.E-02 | 2.74.E-03 | 4.42.E-02 | 9.65.E-04 |
| Skin | 1.27.E-02 | 1.09.E-03 | 1.25.E-02 | 3.13.E-04 |
| Spleen | 7.34.E-01 | 2.61.E-01 | 5.97.E-01 | 3.26.E-02 |
| Thymus | 5.81.E-02 | 1.90.E-03 | 5.41.E-02 | 1.20.E-03 |
| Urinary Bladder Wall | 1.41.E+00 | 6.31.E-01 | 1.74.E+00 | 6.47.E-01 |
| Uterus | 6.43.E-02 | 2.10.E-02 | 7.75.E-02 | 1.77.E-02 |
| Total Body | 5.57.E-02 | 3.44.E-03 | 5.50.E-02 | 6.34.E-04 |
| Effective Dose Equivalent | 6.95.E-01 | 9.47.E-02 | 6.73.E-01 | 3.08.E-02 |
| Effective Dose (mSv/MBq) | 8.81.E-01 | 1.38.E-01 | 8.29.E-01 | 7.19.E-02 |
*SD: standard deviation.
Figure 3Atorvastatin suppresses HIF-1α and VEGF, leading to reduced tumor angiogenic activity in atorvastatin-treated cells. (a) NanoString analysis and unsupervised algorithms. Using 718 probe set with highest variable gene expression, two clusters of co-expressed genes were defined using hierarchical clustering. (b) Two clusters of co-expressed genes for angiogenesis and response to hypoxia. (c) String network analysis for response to hypoxia. HIF-1α, VEGF A, and VEGF B were highly correlated. (d) mRNA level of HIF-1α by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR revealed that ATV attenuated the mRNA levels of HIF-1α in ATV-treated Raji cells. (e) Transcriptional activity of HIF-1α in ATV-treated cells. (f) HIF-1α protein level by western blotting. mRNA and protein level of HIF-1α, and transcriptional activity of HIF-1α also decreased in ATV-treated cells. The mRNA level of HIF-1α by qRT-PCR (g) The mRNA level of VEGF by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR revealed that ATV attenuated the mRNA levels of VEGF in ATV-treated Raji cells. (h) Transcriptional activity of VEGF. (i) VEGF protein level by western blotting. The mRNA and protein level of VEGF, and transcriptional activity of VEGF were also decreased in ATV-treated cells.
Figure 4Target relationship between miR-346 and HIF-1a in the Raji cells. (a) Hierarchical clustering of miRNA expression reveals a descending ordered list of significant miRNA clusters in the untreated control cells. (b) Venn diagram presenting the number of putative miRNA candidates by two prediction programs and microRNA microarray. (c) The sequence alignment of miR-346 with the 3′UTR of HIF-1α gene was searched in the miRNA database. (d) The relative expression of miR-346 in Raji cells was analyzed according to the concentration of ATV via qRT-PCR (**p < 0.005). (e) The mRNA expression of HIF-1α and VEGF was measured by using qRT-PCR after miR-346 treatment in Raji cells. (f) The level of HIF-1α determined by ELISA after miR-346 transfection (**p < 0.005). (g) The level of VEGF determined by ELISA after miR-346 transfection (**p < 0.005). (h) The protein expression of HIF-1α determined by western blotting in hypoxia-induced-Raji cells.
Figure 5Target relationship between miR-346 and HIF-1a in Raji cells. (a) The cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies after miR-346 inhibitor treatment (*p < 0.05). (b) Cells were treated with ATV and miR-346 inhibitor for 24 h, and ELISA was performed to quantify the level of HIF-1α transcription activity. (c) Representative images of Raji tumor-bearing mice after injection of each treatment. (d) In vivo tumor growth delay of Raji xenografts intratumorally-treated with ATV, ATV+miR-346, ATV+miR-346+miR-346 inhibitor. (e) Tumors were excised and weighed at the end of the experiment. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). (f) Western blots of cleaved PARP protein levels in Raji xenografts. (g) HIF-1α immunohistochemical stain levels in mice receiving each treatment and corresponding result of IHC scoring. (h) Representative images of tumors isolated from each treated mice, n = 4. (i) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was examined by immunohistochemistry.
Figure 6Atorvastatin and miR-346 regulated the radiosensitivity of Raji cells. (a) The cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies after atorvastatin and radiation and miR-346 inhibitor treatment (*p < 0.05). (b) The cell viability was measured by CCK8-assay in Raji cells treated with atorvastatin and/or miR-346-inhibitor under 2, 4, and 8 Gy irradiation. (c) Cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (d). Cell cycle analysis was conducted by PI-staining in each group at 24 h after IR (*p < 0.05). The data are the mean ± SD from three independent groups. (e). Cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Western blotting showed that radiation alone led to significant accumulation of cyclin B and p-CDC2, a key cell cycle regulator involved in the G2/M transition. (f) γH2AX expression was measured by western blotting in cell lysates of each group at 3 h after IR. (g) Immunofluorescence staining of γH2AX in each group and comet assay was imaged by confocal microscopy (blue; DAPI, red; γH2AX). (h) The formation of colonies in 3D culture was photographed by using an In Cell analyzer after various treatments. (i) Tumor cell invasion was assessed using Matrigel invasion assay.