Literature DB >> 22171082

Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose.

Suzanne H Alonzo1.   

Abstract

Explaining the evolution of male care has proved difficult. Recent theory predicts that female promiscuity and sexual selection on males inherently disfavour male care. In sharp contrast to these expectations, male-only care is often found in species with high extra-pair paternity and striking variation in mating success, where current theory predicts female-only care. Using a model that examines the coevolution of male care, female care and female choice; I show that inter-sexual selection can drive the evolution of male care when females are able to bias mating or paternity towards parental males. Surprisingly, female choice for parental males allows male care to evolve despite low relatedness between the male and the offspring in his care. These results imply that predicting how sexual selection affects parental care evolution will require further understanding of why females, in many species, either do not prefer or cannot favour males that provide care.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22171082      PMCID: PMC3297463          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Sexual selection and the evolution of exclusive paternal care in arthropods.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  A self-consistent approach to paternity and parental effort.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; John M McNamara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Daniel E L Promislow; John C Avise
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Wright meets AD: not all landscapes are adaptive.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; F Rousset
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Will male advertisement be a reliable indicator of paternal care, if offspring survival depends on male care?

Authors:  Natasha B Kelly; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Paternity and the evolution of male parental care.

Authors:  J H Werren; M R Gross; R Shine
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Development of microsatellite markers for parentage analysis in the great tinamou (Tinamus major).

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Chaz Hyseni
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.090

View more
  12 in total

1.  Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Dóra Kötél; Miklós Laczi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Lutz Fromhage; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Coevolution influences the evolution of filial cannibalism, offspring abandonment and parental care.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The costs and benefits of paternal care in fish: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca L Goldberg; Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Jonathan P Green
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sperm competition games when males invest in paternal care.

Authors:  Gustavo S Requena; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sex differences in life history drive evolutionary transitions among maternal, paternal, and bi-parental care.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The origin of parental care in relation to male and female life history.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Michael B Bonsall; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Paternal care decreases foraging activity and body condition, but does not impose survival costs to caring males in a Neotropical arachnid.

Authors:  Gustavo S Requena; Bruno A Buzatto; Eduardo G Martins; Glauco Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Male age mediates reproductive investment and response to paternity assurance.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Megan L Head; Camellia A Williams; Allen J Moore; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.