Literature DB >> 10479542

Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution.

Y Iwasa1, A Pomiankowski.   

Abstract

We previously studied a good genes handicap model in which male quality was heritable and improved offspring viability. We extend our analysis to species in which males provide direct benefits (e.g. parental care, better resources, the absence of contagious diseases). Male quality now affects female fitness by increasing female reproductive success. For this good parent handicap to work, the male signal must have condition-dependent expression. The equilibrium strength of female preference is controlled by the product of signal transmission efficiency, phenotypic variance of male quality and the effectiveness of male quality in improving female reproductive success. The equilibrium resulting from the good parent handicap has exactly the same form as with the good genes handicap. This allows us to compare the relative importance of these two forces in the evolution of female preferences. The handicap models (both good genes and good parent) also show cyclic evolution, as happens with the pure Fisherian model. However, we predict that the handicap process is often strong enough to lead to a stable equilibrium. This leads to the conclusion that cyclic evolution is less likely to occur for handicap than Fisherian traits. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479542     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  37 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.

Authors:  David Houle; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The evolution of risky behaviour in the presence of a sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  Michael Boots; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Remarks on branching-extinction evolutionary cycles.

Authors:  Fabio Dercole
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Animal behaviour: Why promiscuity pays.

Authors:  Lawrence Bellamy; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose.

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Fixed and dilutable benefits: female choice for good genes or fertility.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Robert M Seymour; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.