Literature DB >> 22170253

Modified Limberg transposition flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

B Kaya1, C Eris, S Atalay, O Bat, N E Bulut, B Mantoglu, K Karabulut.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common problem in surgical practice. Different non-surgical and surgical methods have been used for treating PSD. Flap techniques including the Limberg flap have become more popular in recent years. A modified Limberg flap was used to reduce the problems of skin maceration and recurrence associated with the conventional Limberg flap technique. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of the modified Limberg flap technique for PSD.
METHODS: Medical records of 94 patients with PSD who had been treated with a modified Limberg flap between December 2006 and 2009 were evaluated. The patients' age, sex, duration of preoperative symptoms, operative time, mean hospital stay, postoperative complications, wound infection rate, maceration rate and recurrence rate, time until return to work, time until sitting on the toilet without pain, hypoesthesia in the gluteal region, and satisfaction score were recorded during follow-up or at the last interview. Clinical data were obtained at the end of the 5th postoperative day and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery.
RESULTS: There were 83 male and 11 female patients. The mean operative time was 38.95 ± 6.77 min (range 30-67 min). All patients were followed up longer than 12 months, and the mean follow-up period was 30.97 ± 12.7 months (range 12-54 months). While wound dehiscence was observed in only one patient, we did not detect any case of flap necrosis. Two cases of seroma were observed. Wound infection was detected in 5 patients (5.3%). Surgical drainage was performed in 2 cases. Another 3 patients were treated with oral antibiotics. Maceration of the surgical incision site was detected in 8 patients (8.5%) who were all successfully treated with conservative measures. There were 4 patients (4.2%) with recurrence in this series.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with the available data on use of the conventional Limberg flap for PSD, our results suggest that use of the modified Limberg flap is associated with a lower maceration and recurrence rate, and greater patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22170253     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0799-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  17 in total

1.  Cleft closure for the treatment of unhealed perineal sinus.

Authors:  G Branagan; M R Thompson; A Senapati
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap.

Authors:  Ramazan Eryilmaz; Mustafa Sahin; Orhan Alimoglu; Fatih Dasiran
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Unroofing and marsupialization should be the first procedure of choice for most pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Maher A Abbas; Talar Tejerian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Superiority of asymmetric modified Limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Alper Cihan; Bulent Hamdi Ucan; Mustafa Comert; Ali Cesur; Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak; Oge Tascilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap.

Authors:  T Schoeller; G Wechselberger; A Otto; C Papp
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Electrocauterization in the treatment of pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar

7.  Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease: worthwhile option with an acceptable recurrence rate.

Authors:  S N S Gilani; H Furlong; K Reichardt; A O Nasr; G Theophilou; T N Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach.

Authors:  J H Armstrong; P J Barcia
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-09

Review 9.  Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options.

Authors:  S Chintapatla; N Safarani; S Kumar; N Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  K Søndenaa; E Andersen; I Nesvik; J A Søreide
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  11 in total

1.  Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  K Arslan; S Said Kokcam; H Koksal; E Turan; A Atay; O Dogru
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Karydakis flap reconstruction versus Limberg flap transposition for pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dimitrios Prassas; Thomas-Marten Rolfs; Franz-Josef Schumacher; Andreas Krieg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma arising in a neglected pilonidal sinus: report of a case and literature review.

Authors:  Ramazan Eryılmaz; Tuna Bilecik; Ismail Okan; Orhan Veli Ozkan; Aytekin Coşkun; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-02-15

4.  Fibrin glue is a quick and effective treatment for primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  T S Sian; P J J Herrod; J E M Blackwell; E J O Hardy; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Is the lateralization distance important in terms in patients undergoing the modified Limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus?

Authors:  B R Karakaş; A Aslaner; U R Gündüz; H Çalış; A N Öngen; O Z Öner; N Bülbüller
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  S-shaped wide excision with primary closure for extensive chronic pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Kerem Karaman; Safak Ozturk; Cem Tugmen; Eyup Kebapcı; Sait Murat Dogan; Mutlu Unver; Mustafa Olmez; Cengiz Aydin
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2014-06-02

7.  Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emin Kose; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Hasan Tonyali; Muslum Karagulle
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of intradermal absorbable and mattress sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds with Limberg flap: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Kenan Çetin; Hasan Ediz Sikar; Aytaç Emre Kocaoğlu; Muhammet Fikri Kündeş; Mehmet Karahan; Levent Kaptanoğlu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Squamous cell carcinoma over pilonidal chronic disease. A new therapeutic approach.

Authors:  A Mayol Oltra; E Boldó Roda; R Lozoya Albacar; V Morillo Macias; N Nobleja Quiles
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.