Literature DB >> 25445835

Is the lateralization distance important in terms in patients undergoing the modified Limberg flap procedure for treatment of pilonidal sinus?

B R Karakaş1, A Aslaner, U R Gündüz, H Çalış, A N Öngen, O Z Öner, N Bülbüller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the lateralization distance causes differences in the flattening ratio of the natal cleft, early complications, or recurrence rates in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease undergoing the modified Limberg flap.
METHODS: This clinical study was conducted from March 2012 to April 2013. Forty patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease were divided into two groups of 20 patients, each according to the lateralization distance of the lower part of the Limberg flap incision (Group I, 1 cm lateralized; Group II, 2 cm lateralized). Early wound complications, recurrence rates, and the flattening ratio of the natal cleft were evaluated.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in operating time (mean 42.2 ± 5.7 and 42.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively; p = 0.855), drain removal time [median 3 (range 2-10) and 4 (range 2-14) days, respectively; p = 0.1], or length of hospitalization [median 1 (range 1-3) and 1 (range 1-4) days, respectively; p = 0.775] were found between the groups. The mean follow-up period was 12.8 ± 3.7 months. Recurrence was observed in only one patient of Group II. There were no statistically significant differences in the flattening ratio of the natal cleft, overall wound complications, or recurrence between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in early complications or recurrence rates were found between the two different lateralization distances in the modified Limberg flap procedure. Therefore, we conclude that 1-cm lateralization of the lower part of the incision is sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445835     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1252-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  28 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap.

Authors:  Ramazan Eryilmaz; Mustafa Sahin; Orhan Alimoglu; Fatih Dasiran
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  THE ELIMINATION OF CAUSAL FACTORS IN PILONIDAL SINUS TREATED BY Z-PLASTY.

Authors:  R S MONRO; F T MCDERMOTT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Superiority of asymmetric modified Limberg flap for surgical treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Alper Cihan; Bulent Hamdi Ucan; Mustafa Comert; Ali Cesur; Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak; Oge Tascilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  [Therapy of pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap].

Authors:  R Ozgültekin; Y Ersan; M Ozcan; F Ozçelik; V Celik; A Cerçel; M Sakaoğlu
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for the treatment of recalcitrant pilonidal disease.

Authors:  J A Perez-Gurri; W J Temple; A S Ketcham
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Mehmet Fatih Can; Mert Mahsuni Sevinc; Oguz Hancerliogullari; Mehmet Yilmaz; Gokhan Yagci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Comparison of short-term results of modified Karydakis flap and modified Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Turgut Karaca; Omer Yoldaş; Bülent Çağlar Bilgin; Saadet Ozer; Suna Yoldaş; Nihal Gördesel Karaca
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 8.  Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Cüneyt Kayaalp; Canbek Seven
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Sinus excision, release of coccycutaneous attachments and dermal-subcuticular closure (XRD procedure): a novel technique in flattening the natal cleft in pilonidal sinus treatment.

Authors:  Deya M Marzouk; Ahmed A Abou-Zeid; Anthony Antoniou; Amyn Haji; H Benziger
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Alper Cihan; B B Mentes; E Tatlicioglu; S Ozmen; S Leventoglu; B H Ucan
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  D Segre; M Pozzo; R Perinotti; B Roche
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.