BACKGROUND & AIMS:Enteral nutrition (EN) is provided for patients with cancer. However, Little is known about the clinical efficacy of EN support during chemotherapy in patients with cancer. METHODS: Ninety-one patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and adriamycin) for esophageal cancer were enrolled to receive either EN (n = 47) or PN (n = 44) at random. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities during chemotherapy. RESULTS:Total and dietary intake calories during chemotherapy were equal in the two groups. There were no significant differences in serum albumin level and body weight change after chemotherapy between the two groups. There was no significant difference in tumor response to chemotherapy between the two groups (EN: 51%, PN: 55%, p = 0.886). Leukopenia and neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, defined according to the Common Toxicities Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, were significantly less frequent in the EN group than PN group (leukopenia: 17% vs 41%, p = 0.011, neutropenia: 36% vs 66%, p = 0.005). Lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia tended to be less frequent in the EN group, albeit insignificantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PN support, EN support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related hematological toxicities in patients with esophageal cancers.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral nutrition (EN) is provided for patients with cancer. However, Little is known about the clinical efficacy of EN support during chemotherapy in patients with cancer. METHODS: Ninety-one patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and adriamycin) for esophageal cancer were enrolled to receive either EN (n = 47) or PN (n = 44) at random. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chemotherapy-related toxicities during chemotherapy. RESULTS: Total and dietary intake calories during chemotherapy were equal in the two groups. There were no significant differences in serum albumin level and body weight change after chemotherapy between the two groups. There was no significant difference in tumor response to chemotherapy between the two groups (EN: 51%, PN: 55%, p = 0.886). Leukopenia and neutropenia of grade 3 or 4, defined according to the Common Toxicities Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, were significantly less frequent in the EN group than PN group (leukopenia: 17% vs 41%, p = 0.011, neutropenia: 36% vs 66%, p = 0.005). Lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia tended to be less frequent in the EN group, albeit insignificantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PN support, EN support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related hematological toxicities in patients with esophageal cancers.
Authors: Zhihao Lu; Li Yang; Jingwei Yu; Ming Lu; Xiaotian Zhang; Jian Li; Jun Zhou; Xicheng Wang; Jifang Gong; Jing Gao; Jie Li; Yan Li; Lin Shen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240