Literature DB >> 24244880

Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for supportive therapy of advanced aerodigestive cancer.

Haruei Ogino1, Hirotada Akiho.   

Abstract

Aerodigestive cancer, like esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer, is well known to have a poor prognosis. It is often diagnosed in the late stages, with dysphagia being the major symptom. Insufficient nutrition and lack of stimulation of the intestinal mucosa may worsen immune compromise due to toxic side effects. A poor nutritional status is a significant prognostic factor for increased mortality. Therefore, it is most important to optimize enteral nutrition in patients with aerodigestive cancer before and during treatment, as well as during palliative treatment. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) may be useful for nutritional support. However, PEG tube placement is limited by digestive tract stenosis and is an invasive endoscopic procedure with a risk of complications. There are three PEG techniques. The pull/push and introducer methods have been established as standard techniques for PEG tube placement. The modified introducer method, namely the direct method, allows for direct placement of a larger button-bumper-type catheter device. PEG tube placement using the introducer method or the direct method may be a much safer alternative than the pull/push method. PEG may be recommended in patients with aerodigestive cancer because of the improved complication rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerodigestive cancer; Complications; Direct method; Introducer method; Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; Pull/push method

Year:  2013        PMID: 24244880      PMCID: PMC3829456          DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v4.i4.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol        ISSN: 2150-5330


  47 in total

1.  Relationship between immunological parameters and the severity of neutropenia and effect of enteral nutrition on immune status during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Takushi Yasuda; Hiroshi Miyata; Ying Feng Peng; Makoto Yamasaki; Osamu Shiraishi; Koji Tanaka; Osamu Ishikawa; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  S Gabor; H Renner; V Matzi; B Ratzenhofer; J Lindenmann; O Sankin; H Pinter; A Maier; J Smolle; F M Smolle-Jüttner
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  Palliative therapy.

Authors:  Marjolein Y V Homs; Ernst J Kuipers; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Early enteral nutrition reduces the rate of life-threatening complications after thoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  T Fujita; H Daiko; M Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Controlled percutaneous gastrostomy: nylon T-fastener for fixation of the anterior gastric wall.

Authors:  A S Brown; P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Safety of pull-type and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in oncology patients: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Evi Van Dyck; Elisabeth J Macken; Bernard Roth; Paul A Pelckmans; Tom G Moreels
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for nutritional palliation of upper esophageal cancer unsuitable for esophageal stenting.

Authors:  Ana Grilo; Carla Adriana Santos; Jorge Fonseca
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

8.  Polyflex stents for malignant oesophageal and oesophagogastric stricture: a prospective, multicentric study.

Authors:  Rita Conigliaro; Giorgio Battaglia; Alessandro Repici; Giovanni De Pretis; Luigi Ghezzo; Max Bittinger; Helmut Messmann; Jean-François Demarquay; Michele Togni; Sabrina Blanchi; Rosangela Filiberti; Massimo Conio
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 9.  Nutritional support during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the role of prophylactic feeding tube placement.

Authors:  Jormain Cady
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.027

10.  Prospective evaluation of malignant cell seeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with oropharyngeal/esophageal cancers.

Authors:  M Ellrichmann; P Sergeev; J Bethge; A Arlt; T Topalidis; P Ambrosch; J Wiltfang; A Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  5 in total

1.  Usefulness of Percutaneous Transesophageal Gastro-Tubing in Patients Receiving Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Atsushi Naganuma; Ayaka Kishi; Yusuke Ogawa; Tomohiro Kudo; Yoshizumi Kitamoto; Tetsushi Ogawa; Hideto Oishi
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2019-11-28

Review 2.  Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.

Authors:  Anand Rajan; Peerapol Wangrattanapranee; Jonathan Kessler; Trilokesh Dey Kidambi; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in cancer patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hala Mansoor; Muhammad Adnan Masood; Muhammed Aasim Yusuf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

Review 4.  Palliative Endoscopic Therapy of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Rabenstein
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Palliative enteral feeding for patients with malignant esophageal obstruction: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C W Yang; H H Lin; T Y Hsieh; W K Chang
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.