Literature DB >> 22168740

Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

Alexey V Kamenskiy1, Iraklis I Pipinos, Jason N MacTaggart, Syed A Jaffar Kazmi, Yuris A Dzenis.   

Abstract

Patch angioplasty is the most common technique used for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. A large number of patching materials are available for use while new materials are being continuously developed. Surprisingly little is known about the mechanical properties of these materials and how these properties compare with those of the carotid artery wall. Mismatch of the mechanical properties can produce mechanical and hemodynamic effects that may compromise the long-term patency of the endarterectomized arterial segment. The aim of this paper was to systematically evaluate and compare the biaxial mechanical behavior of the most commonly used patching materials. We compared PTFE (n  =  1), Dacron (n  =  2), bovine pericardium (n  =  10), autogenous greater saphenous vein (n  =  10), and autogenous external jugular vein (n  =  9) with the wall of the common carotid artery (n  =  18). All patching materials were found to be significantly stiffer than the carotid wall in both the longitudinal and circumferential directions. Synthetic patches demonstrated the most mismatch in stiffness values and vein patches the least mismatch in stiffness values compared to those of the native carotid artery. All biological materials, including the carotid artery, demonstrated substantial nonlinearity, anisotropy, and variability; however, the behavior of biological and biologically-derived patches was both qualitatively and quantitatively different from the behavior of the carotid wall. The majority of carotid arteries tested were stiffer in the circumferential direction, while the opposite anisotropy was observed for all types of vein patches and bovine pericardium. The rates of increase in the nonlinear stiffness over the physiological stress range were also different for the carotid and patching materials. Several carotid wall samples exhibited reverse anisotropy compared to the average behavior of the carotid tissue. A similar characteristic was observed for two of 19 vein patches. The obtained results quantify, for the first time, significant mechanical dissimilarity of the currently available patching materials and the carotid artery. The results can be used as guidance for designing more efficient patches with mechanical properties resembling those of the carotid wall. The presented systematic comparative mechanical analysis of the existing patching materials provides valuable information for patch selection in the daily practice of carotid surgery and can be used in future clinical studies comparing the efficacy of different patches in the performance of carotid endarterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22168740      PMCID: PMC5413157          DOI: 10.1115/1.4005434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  48 in total

1.  Tissue reactions to synthetic materials.

Authors:  J T SCALES
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1953-08

2.  Novel biphasic elastomeric scaffold for small-diameter blood vessel tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Delara Motlagh; Antonio R Webb; Guillermo A Ameer
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy.

Authors:  Todd Courtney; Michael S Sacks; John Stankus; Jianjun Guan; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: III. Effect of uniaxial and sequential biaxial stress during fixation on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium.

Authors:  J M Lee; M Ku; S A Haberer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1989-05

5.  Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Caron B Rockman; Ethan A Halm; Jason J Wang; Mark R Chassin; Stanley Tuhrim; Patricia Formisano; Thomas S Riles
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Age dependency of the biaxial biomechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta.

Authors:  Jonathan P Vande Geest; Michael S Sacks; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; P A Robinson; S Saiedy; J H Kahn; J P Boland
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention.

Authors:  Joseph J Ricotta; Michele Piazza
Journal:  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther       Date:  2010-06

9.  A prospective, randomized study of saphenous vein patching versus synthetic patching during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Hara; Norman R Hertzer; Edward J Mascha; Leonard P Krajewski; Daniel G Clair; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery.

Authors:  Gerhardt Konig; Todd N McAllister; Nathalie Dusserre; Sergio A Garrido; Corey Iyican; Alicia Marini; Alex Fiorillo; Hernan Avila; Wojciech Wystrychowski; Krzysztof Zagalski; Marcin Maruszewski; Alyce Linthurst Jones; Lech Cierpka; Luis M de la Fuente; Nicolas L'Heureux
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  4 in total

1.  A mathematical evaluation of hemodynamic parameters after carotid eversion and conventional patch angioplasty.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Yuris A Dzenis; Prateek K Gupta; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Jason N Mactaggart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: Does the flow really change? An Echo-Color-Doppler analysis.

Authors:  Pierleone Lucatelli; Fabrizio Fanelli; Carlo Cirelli; Beatrice Sacconi; Michele Anzidei; Roberto Montisci; Roberto Sanfilippo; Elisabetta Tamponi; Carlo Catalano; Luca Saba
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Micropatterned cell sheets as structural building blocks for biomimetic vascular patches.

Authors:  Nae Gyune Rim; Alice Yih; Peter Hsi; Yunjie Wang; Yanhang Zhang; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Passive biaxial mechanical properties and in vivo axial pre-stretch of the diseased human femoropopliteal and tibial arteries.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Yuris A Dzenis; Carol S Lomneth; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Nicholas Y Phillips; Jason N MacTaggart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 8.947

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.