Literature DB >> 15796340

Age dependency of the biaxial biomechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta.

Jonathan P Vande Geest1, Michael S Sacks, David A Vorp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biomechanical behavior of the human abdominal aorta has been studied with great interest primarily due to its propensity to develop such maladies as atherosclerotic occlusive disease, dissections, and aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the age-related biaxial biomechanical behavior of human infrarenal aortic tissue. METHODS OF APPROACH: A total of 18 samples (13 autopsy, 5 organ donor) were harvested from patients in each of three age groups: Group 1 (<30 years old, n=5), Group 2 (between 30 and 60 years old, n=7), and Group 3 (>60 years old, n=6). Each specimen was tested biaxially using a tension-controlled protocol which spanned a large portion of the strain plane. Response functions fit to experimental data were used as a tool to guide the appropriate choice of the strain energy function W.
RESULTS: Under an equibiaxial tension of 120 N/m, the average peak stretch values in the circumferential direction for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were (mean +/-SD) 1.46 +/- 0.07, 1.15 +/- 0.07, and 1.11 +/- 0.06, respectively, while the peak stretch values in the longitudinal direction were 1.41 +/- 0.03, 1.19 +/- 0.11, and 1.10 +/- 0.04, respectively. There were no significant differences between the average longitudinal and circumferential peak stretch within each group (p > 0.1), but both of these values were significantly less (p < 0.001) for Groups 2 and 3 when compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 1 were modeled using a polynomial strain energy function W, while patients in Groups 2 and 3 were modeled using an exponential form of W, suggesting an age-dependent shift in the mechanical response of this tissue.
CONCLUSION: The biaxial tensile testing results reported here are, to our knowledge, the first given for the human infrarenal aorta and reinforce the importance of determining the functional form of W from experimental data. Such information may be useful for the clinician or researcher in identifying key changes in the biomechanical response of abdominal aorta in the presence of an aneurysm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15796340     DOI: 10.1115/1.1824121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  48 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason N MacTaggart; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Yuris A Dzenis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Characterizing the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  Riaz Akhtar; Michael J Sherratt; J Kennedy Cruickshank; Brian Derby
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 3.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanics of porcine renal arteries and role of axial stretch.

Authors:  Stéphane Avril; Pierre Badel; Mohamed Gabr; Michael A Sutton; Susan M Lessner
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Mechanical and structural changes in human thoracic aortas with age.

Authors:  Majid Jadidi; Mahmoud Habibnezhad; Eric Anttila; Kaspars Maleckis; Anastasia Desyatova; Jason MacTaggart; Alexey Kamenskiy
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Collagen fiber alignment and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine urinary bladder derived extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; Silvia Wognum; Erinn M Joyce; Donald O Freytes; Michael S Sacks; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Prior Distributions of Material Parameters for Bayesian Calibration of Growth and Remodeling Computational Model of Abdominal Aortic Wall.

Authors:  Sajjad Seyedsalehi; Liangliang Zhang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Anisotropic residual stresses in arteries.

Authors:  Taisiya Sigaeva; Gerhard Sommer; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Elena S Di Martino
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human.

Authors:  S Roccabianca; C A Figueroa; G Tellides; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-02-09

Review 10.  Elastin and collagen fibre microstructure of the human aorta in ageing and disease: a review.

Authors:  Alkiviadis Tsamis; Jeffrey T Krawiec; David A Vorp
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.