Literature DB >> 9510277

Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up.

A F AbuRahma1, P A Robinson, S Saiedy, J H Kahn, J P Boland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and the incidence of recurrent stenosis (> or = 50%) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with primary closure (PC) versus vein patch closure (VPC), saphenous (SVP), and jugular vein (JVP) and polytetrafluoroethylene patch closure (PTFE-P).
METHODS: A total of 399 CEAs were randomized into the following groups: 135 PC, 134 PTFE-P, and 130 VPC (SVP alternating with JVP). Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 30 months with a range of 1 to 62 months, and demographic characteristics were similar in all groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of restenosis and the stroke-free survival.
RESULTS: The incidence of ipsilateral stroke was 5% (seven of 135) for PC, 1% (one of 134) for PTFE-P, and 0% for VPC (PC vs VPC, p = 0.008; PC vs PTFE-P, p = 0.034). Seven strokes occurred in the perioperative period. All three groups had similar mortality rates. The cumulative stroke-free survival rate at 48 months was 82% for PC, 84% for PTFE-P, and 88% for VPC (p < 0.01 for PC vs PTFE-P or VPC). PC had a higher incidence of recurrent stenosis and occlusion (34%) than PTFE-P (2%) and VPC (9%) (SVP 9%, JVP 8%) (p < 0.001). PTFE-P had a lower recurrent stenosis rate than VPC (p < 0.045). Restenoses necessitating a redo CEA were also higher for PC (11%) than for PTFE-P (1%) and VPC (2%) (p < 0.001). Women with PC had a higher recurrent stenosis rate than men (46% vs 23%, p = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from recurrent stenosis at 48 months was 47% for PC, 84% for VPC, and 96% for PTFE-P (p < 0.001). The SVP and JVP results were comparable. The mean operative diameter of the internal carotid artery was similar in patients with or without restenosis. Significantly more late internal carotid artery dilatations occurred in the VPC group compared with the PC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patch closure (VPC or PTFE-P) is less likely than PC to cause perioperative stroke. Patching was also superior in lowering the incidence of late recurrent stenoses, especially in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9510277     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70353-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  23 in total

1.  Analysis of regression of postoperative carotid stenosis from prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy comparing primary closure versus patching.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; P A Robinson; D L Stickler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparative analysis of the biaxial mechanical behavior of carotid wall tissue and biological and synthetic materials used for carotid patch angioplasty.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason N MacTaggart; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Yuris A Dzenis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.

Authors:  Albeir Y Mousa; Ali F AbuRahma; Joseph Bozzay; Mike Broce; Maher Kali; Michael Yacoub; Patrick Stone; Mark C Bates
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Effect of statins on early and late clinical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and the rate of post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; Patrick A Stone; Bryan K Richmond; Zachary AbuRahma; Will Jackson; L Scott Dean; Albeir Y Mousa
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects.

Authors:  Akihito Muto; Toshiya Nishibe; Herbert Dardik; Alan Dardik
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability.

Authors:  D M Shah; R C Darling; B B Chang; P S Paty; P B Kreienberg; W E Lloyd; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL versus Vascu-Guard patching in carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; Ali F AbuRahma; Albeir Y Mousa; David Phang; Stephen M Hass; Asmita Modak; David Dearing
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  Pretreatment of pericardial patches with antibiotics does not alter patch healing in vivo.

Authors:  Hualong Bai; Go Kuwahara; Mo Wang; Kirstyn E Brownson; Trenton R Foster; Kota Yamamoto; Ying Xing; Alan Dardik
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 10.  Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.

Authors:  Kittipan Rerkasem; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.