| Literature DB >> 36104642 |
Lee Gabler1, Declan Patton2, Mark Begonia3, Ray Daniel4, Ahmad Rezaei5, Colin Huber2,6, Gunter Siegmund7,8, Tyler Rooks4, Lyndia Wu9.
Abstract
Wearable devices are increasingly used to measure real-world head impacts and study brain injury mechanisms. These devices must undergo validation testing to ensure they provide reliable and accurate information for head impact sensing, and controlled laboratory testing should be the first step of validation. Past validation studies have applied varying methodologies, and some devices have been deployed for on-field use without validation. This paper presents best practices recommendations for validating wearable head kinematic devices in the laboratory, with the goal of standardizing validation test methods and data reporting. Key considerations, recommended approaches, and specific considerations were developed for four main aspects of laboratory validation, including surrogate selection, test conditions, data collection, and data analysis. Recommendations were generated by a group with expertise in head kinematic sensing and laboratory validation methods and reviewed by a larger group to achieve consensus on best practices. We recommend that these best practices are followed by manufacturers, users, and reviewers to conduct and/or review laboratory validation of wearable devices, which is a minimum initial step prior to on-field validation and deployment. We anticipate that the best practices recommendations will lead to more rigorous validation of wearable head kinematic devices and higher accuracy in head impact data, which can subsequently advance brain injury research and management.Entities:
Keywords: Accuracy; Best practices; Head impact kinematics; Recommendations; Validation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36104642 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03066-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Biomed Eng ISSN: 0090-6964 Impact factor: 4.219