Literature DB >> 22167441

The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants.

Michael R Norton1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium- to long-term clinical outcome of single-tooth implants placed into fresh extraction sockets using a low-insertion-torque protocol and immediately restored with acrylic resin provisional crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients consecutively referred for the replacement of one or more failing teeth were planned for treatment by means of extraction and immediate implant placement and provisionalization using a low-insertion-torque protocol of ≤ 25 Ncm. Low rotational stability was not a contraindication to treatment unless there was a lack of axial stability. Implant survival and marginal bone levels were documented. A statistical analysis was performed to discover any correlations between insertion torque, age, gender, implant size and tooth position and marginal bone loss.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight implants were placed. Three implants failed to osseointegrate; one was replaced and immediately restored and has been successful for more than 5 years. The overall survival rate for all implants was 95.5%, which have been in function for a period of 1.25 to 9.5 years. The mean marginal bone loss of the 54 implants followed for at least 24 months was 0.23 ± 0.60 mm mesially and 0.20 ± 0.72 mm distally. Overall, 78% of implants showed no marginal bone loss, 9% experienced 0.1 to 0.5 mm of bone loss, and 13% demonstrated > 0.5 mm of bone loss. There were no significant correlations between the various parameters analyzed and marginal bone loss.
CONCLUSION: A torque of only 25 Ncm would seem more than sufficient to yield a favorable clinical outcome, and there may be a misconception as to what actually represents adequate primary stability. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants placed with a relatively low insertion torque can yield favorable survival rates and optimal maintenance of marginal bone levels compared to the generally accepted norm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

Review 1.  Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21

Review 2.  Osseodensification -- A systematic review and qualitative analysis of published literature.

Authors:  Ninad Milind Padhye; Ashvini Mukul Padhye; Neel B Bhatavadekar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-02

3.  Peri-implant bone response following immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone and with immediate provisionalization--a case series study.

Authors:  Carolina Martin; Geninho Thomé; Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo; Flavia Noemy Gasparini Kiatake Fontão
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-23

4.  A Simplified Prosthetic Implant Loading Protocol: 1-Year Clinical Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Andreatta; Malin Bjursten Brailsford; Jakob Zwaan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-08-03

5.  Immediate Loading of Short Implants in Posterior Maxillae: Case Series.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-06

6.  Clinical study of octacalcium phosphate and collagen composite in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Tadashi Kawai; Shinji Kamakura; Keiko Matsui; Masayuki Fukuda; Hiroshi Takano; Mitsuyoshi Iino; Shigeo Ishikawa; Hiromasa Kawana; Tomoya Soma; Eisaku Imamura; Hideki Kizu; Aya Michibata; Izumi Asahina; Keiichiro Miura; Norifumi Nakamura; Toshiro Kibe; Osamu Suzuki; Tetsu Takahashi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 7.813

7.  The Bone Buttress Theory: The Effect of the Mechanical Loading of Bone on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants.

Authors:  David Chavarri-Prado; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Ángel Álvarez-Arenal; Markel Dieguez-Pereira; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Iratxe Viteri-Agustín; Alejandro Estrada-Martínez
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-28

8.  Correlation between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient in Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design.

Authors:  Domenico Baldi; Teresa Lombardi; Jacopo Colombo; Gabriele Cervino; Giuseppe Perinetti; Roberto Di Lenarda; Claudio Stacchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The effect of implant placement torque on crestal bone remodeling after 1 year of loading.

Authors:  Salwa Aldahlawi; Angela Demeter; Tassos Irinakis
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-10-09

10.  Under-Drilling versus Hybrid Osseodensification Technique: Differences in Implant Primary Stability and Bone Density of the Implant Bed Walls.

Authors:  Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Joshua Gold; Tanya Somohano Marquez; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.