Literature DB >> 22164835

Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests.

Daniel C Reed1, Andrew Rassweiler, Mark H Carr, Kyle C Cavanaugh, Daniel P Malone, David A Siegel.   

Abstract

We took advantage of regional differences in environmental forcing and consumer abundance to examine the relative importance of nutrient availability (bottom-up), grazing pressure (top-down), and storm waves (disturbance) in determining the standing biomass and net primary production (NPP) of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in central and southern California. Using a nine-year data set collected from 17 sites we show that, despite high densities of sea urchin grazers and prolonged periods of low nutrient availability in southern California, NPP by giant kelp was twice that of central California where nutrient concentrations were consistently high and sea urchins were nearly absent due to predation by sea otters. Waves associated with winter storms were consistently higher in central California, and the loss of kelp biomass to winter wave disturbance was on average twice that of southern California. These observations suggest that the more intense wave disturbance in central California limited NPP by giant kelp under otherwise favorable conditions. Regional patterns of interannual variation in NPP were similar to those of wave disturbance in that year-to-year variation in disturbance and NPP were both greater in southern California. Our findings provide strong evidence that regional differences in wave disturbance overwhelmed those of nutrient supply and grazing intensity to determine NPP by giant kelp. The important role of disturbance in controlling NPP revealed by our study is likely not unique to giant kelp forests, as vegetation dynamics in many systems are dominated by post-disturbance succession with climax communities being relatively uncommon. The effects of disturbance frequency may be easier to detect in giant kelp because it is fast growing and relatively short lived, with cycles of disturbance and recovery occurring on time scales of years. Much longer data sets (decades to centuries) will likely be needed to properly evaluate the role of disturbance relative to other processes in determining patterns of NPP in other systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22164835     DOI: 10.1890/11-0377.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  21 in total

1.  Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century.

Authors:  Kira A Krumhansl; Daniel K Okamoto; Andrew Rassweiler; Mark Novak; John J Bolton; Kyle C Cavanaugh; Sean D Connell; Craig R Johnson; Brenda Konar; Scott D Ling; Fiorenza Micheli; Kjell M Norderhaug; Alejandro Pérez-Matus; Isabel Sousa-Pinto; Daniel C Reed; Anne K Salomon; Nick T Shears; Thomas Wernberg; Robert J Anderson; Nevell S Barrett; Alejandro H Buschmann; Mark H Carr; Jennifer E Caselle; Sandrine Derrien-Courtel; Graham J Edgar; Matt Edwards; James A Estes; Claire Goodwin; Michael C Kenner; David J Kushner; Frithjof E Moy; Julia Nunn; Robert S Steneck; Julio Vásquez; Jane Watson; Jon D Witman; Jarrett E K Byrnes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatially variable synergistic effects of disturbance and additional nutrients on kelp recruitment and recovery.

Authors:  Paul E Carnell; Michael J Keough
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  From the predictable to the unexpected: kelp forest and benthic invertebrate community dynamics following decades of sea otter expansion.

Authors:  Andrew O Shelton; Chris J Harvey; Jameal F Samhouri; Kelly S Andrews; Blake E Feist; Kinsey E Frick; Nick Tolimieri; Gregory D Williams; Liam D Antrim; Helen D Berry
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Trophic versus structural effects of a marine foundation species, giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Henry M Page; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of five southern California macroalgal diets on consumption, growth, and gonad weight, in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Matthew C Foster; Jarrett E K Byrnes; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Light Limitation within Southern New Zealand Kelp Forest Communities.

Authors:  Matthew J Desmond; Daniel W Pritchard; Christopher D Hepburn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Shining light on benthic macroalgae: mechanisms of complementarity in layered macroalgal assemblages.

Authors:  Leigh W Tait; Ian Hawes; David R Schiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trophic cascades induced by lobster fishing are not ubiquitous in southern California kelp forests.

Authors:  Carla M Guenther; Hunter S Lenihan; Laura E Grant; David Lopez-Carr; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Threats and knowledge gaps for ecosystem services provided by kelp forests: a northeast Atlantic perspective.

Authors:  Dan A Smale; Michael T Burrows; Pippa Moore; Nessa O'Connor; Stephen J Hawkins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.