Literature DB >> 26358195

Trophic versus structural effects of a marine foundation species, giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).

Robert J Miller1, Henry M Page2, Daniel C Reed2.   

Abstract

Foundation species create milieus in which ecosystems evolve, altering species abundances and distribution often to a dramatic degree. Although much descriptive work supports their importance, there remains little definitive information on the mechanisms by which foundation species alter their environment. These mechanisms fall into two basic categories: provision of food or other materials, and modification of the physical environment. Here, we manipulated the abundance of a marine foundation species, the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera, in 40 × 40-m plots at Mohawk Reef off Santa Barbara, California and found that its biomass had a strong positive effect on the abundance of bottom-dwelling sessile invertebrates. We examined the carbon (C) stable isotope values of seven species of sessile invertebrates in the treatment plots to test the hypothesis that this positive effect resulted from a nutritional supplement of small suspended particles of kelp detritus, as many studies have posited. We found no evidence from stable isotope analyses to support the hypothesis that kelp detritus is an important food source for sessile suspension-feeding invertebrates. The isotope composition of invertebrates varied with species and season, but was not affected by kelp biomass, with the exception of two species: the tunicate Styela montereyensis, which exhibited a slight enrichment in C stable isotope composition with increasing kelp biomass, and the hydroid Aglaophenia sp., which showed the opposite effect. These results suggest that modification of the physical habitat, rather than nutritional subsidy by kelp detritus, likely accounts for increased abundance of sessile invertebrates within giant kelp forests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detritus; Ecosystem engineers; Macroalgae; Sessile invertebrates; Stable isotopes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26358195     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3441-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community.

Authors:  Sean D Connell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests.

Authors:  Daniel C Reed; Andrew Rassweiler; Mark H Carr; Kyle C Cavanaugh; Daniel P Malone; David A Siegel
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Shading facilitates sessile invertebrate dominance in the rocky subtidal Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Ron J Etter
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems.

Authors:  D O Duggins; C A Simenstad; J A Estes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Benthic suspension feeders: their paramount role in littoral marine food webs.

Authors:  J M Gili; R Coma
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Patch formation by herbivorous fish in a temperate Australian kelp forest.

Authors:  N L Andrew; G P Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.

Authors:  Daniel Reed; Andrew Rassweiler; Katie Arkema
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.573

8.  Mechanisms of interaction between macroalgae and scleractinians on a coral reef in Jamaica.

Authors:  G F. River; P J. Edmunds
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 2.171

9.  Marine reserves demonstrate top-down control of community structure on temperate reefs.

Authors:  Nick T Shears; Russell C Babcock
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Biomass rather than growth rate determines variation in net primary production by giant kelp.

Authors:  Daniel C Reed; Andrew Rassweiler; Katie K Arkema
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  3 in total

1.  Scale-specific drivers of kelp forest communities.

Authors:  Thomas Lamy; Daniel C Reed; Andrew Rassweiler; David A Siegel; Li Kui; Tom W Bell; Rachel D Simons; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, increases faunal diversity through physical engineering.

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Kevin D Lafferty; Thomas Lamy; Li Kui; Andrew Rassweiler; Daniel C Reed
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Foundation species enhance food web complexity through non-trophic facilitation.

Authors:  Annieke C W Borst; Wilco C E P Verberk; Christine Angelini; Jildou Schotanus; Jan-Willem Wolters; Marjolijn J A Christianen; Els M van der Zee; Marlous Derksen-Hooijberg; Tjisse van der Heide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.