| Literature DB >> 22164023 |
Tien M Lai1, Jae-Ki Shin, Jin Hur.
Abstract
Synchronous fluorescence spectra (SFS) and the first derivative spectra of the influent versus the effluent wastewater samples were compared and the use of fluorescence indices is suggested as a means to estimate the biodegradability of the effluent wastewater. Three distinct peaks were identified from the SFS of the effluent wastewater samples. Protein-like fluorescence (PLF) was reduced, whereas fulvic and/or humic-like fluorescence (HLF) were enhanced, suggesting that the two fluorescence characteristics may represent biodegradable and refractory components, respectively. Five fluorescence indices were selected for the biodegradability estimation based on the spectral features changing from the influent to the effluent. Among the selected indices, the relative distribution of PLF to the total fluorescence area of SFS (Index II) exhibited the highest correlation coefficient with total organic carbon (TOC)-based biodegradability, which was even higher than those obtained with the traditional oxygen demand-based parameters. A multiple regression analysis using Index II and the area ratio of PLF to HLF (Index III) demonstrated the enhancement of the correlations from 0.558 to 0.711 for TOC-based biodegradability. The multiple regression equation finally obtained was 0.148 × Index II - 4.964 × Index III - 0.001 and 0.046 × Index II - 1.128 × Index III + 0.026. The fluorescence indices proposed here are expected to be utilized for successful development of real-time monitoring using a simple fluorescence sensing device for the biodegradability of treated sewage.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradability; derivative spectroscopy; multiple regression analysis; synchronous fluorescence spectrum; wastewater
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22164023 PMCID: PMC3231730 DOI: 10.3390/s110807382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Summary of wastewater treatment plants.
| Domestic sewage | 70,000 | Activated sludge process | |
| Domestic sewage | 13,000 | Activated sludge with extended aeration process | |
| Domestic sewage | 150,000 | Activated sludge 4 stage BNR (Biological Nutrient Removal) | |
| Domestic sewage with some landfill leachate | 75,000 | B3 process | |
| Domestic sewage with some livestock waste | 48,000 | B3 process | |
| Livestock waste | 100 | Activated sludge with extended aeration process |
The details of the process are described in Kim et al. [28].
Figure 1.Synchronous fluorescence spectra of the influent (a) and the effluent (b) from WWTPs.
Figure 2.First derivative synchronous fluorescence spectra of the influent (a) and the effluent (b) from WWTPs.
Statistical summary for the biodegradability and the selected fluorescence indices for the effluent samples in this study (n = 18).
| Ratio of biodegradability | |||
| 0.21 | (0.14) | 0.03–0.54 | |
| 0.12 | (0.06) | 0.03–0.27 | |
| 0.24 | (0.12) | 0.06–0.44 | |
| 0.18 | (0.06) | 0.09–0.33 | |
| Fluorescence indices | |||
| 344.51 | (90.62) | 225.89–520.11 | |
| 8.42 | (2.32) | 5.01–12.91 | |
| 0.20 | (0.06) | 0.13–0.31 | |
| 16.87 | (4.41) | 9.67–30.41 | |
| 0.48 | (0.11) | 0.30–0.64 | |
The numbers in the parentheses represent standard deviation.
Figure 3.Correlations between TOC-based biodegradability and BOD/COD ratios (a) and between TOC-based biodegradability and CBOD/COD ratios (b).
The correlation coefficients between the selected fluorescence indices and various types of biodegradability parameters for the effluent.
| 0.297 (0.231) | 0.537 (0.021) | 0.515 (0.029) | 0.027 (0.915) | 0.507 (0.031) | |
| 0.299 (0.227) | 0.643 (0.004) | 0.657 (0.003) | 0.032 (0.898) | 0.636 (0.005) | |
| 0.442 (0.066) | 0.720 (<0.001) | 0.674 (0.002) | 0.146 (0.564) | 0.648 (0.004) | |
| 0.364 (0.137) | 0.558 (0.016) | 0.470 (0.048) | −0.002 (0.994) | 0.347 (0.158) | |
The numbers in the parentheses are p-values.
Figure 4.Correlation between Index II and TOC-based biodegradability (a) and between Index II and DOC-based biodegradability (b).
Figure 5.Correlation between measured TOC-based biodegradability (a) and DOC-based biodegradability (b) and the predicted values by using a multiple regression method based on Index II and Index III.